Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Efficacy of levetiracetam in patients with pediatric epilepsy

Balestrini S, Puliti D, Lombardini M, Bettiol A, Gasparini S, Lomonaco M, Presotto EM, Dalmazio Tarantino EP, De Masi S, Guerrini R. Efficacy of Levetiracetam in Patients With Pediatric Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurology. 2026 Jun 23;106(12):e218080. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000218080. Epub 2026 May 27. PMID: 42202238; PMCID: PMC13225242.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Levetiracetam (LEV) is widely used in pediatric epilepsies because of its favorable pharmacokinetics, ease of administration, and perceived tolerability. However, its comparative efficacy relative to established antiseizure medications (ASMs) in children remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate LEV efficacy in pediatric epilepsies and compare outcomes vs placebo and active comparators.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (2000-6 August 2025) for RCTs enrolling patients 16 years or younger with epilepsy and reporting seizure freedom and/or ≥50% responder rate. Trials including both pediatric and adult patients were eligible if pediatric participants were represented. Comparisons included LEV vs placebo or active ASMs as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. Primary outcomes were seizure freedom and responder rate at the trial's primary endpoint or, if not specified, longest reported follow-up. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. We pooled risk differences (RDs) with 95% CIs using random-effects models, stratified by comparator and epilepsy subtype.

Results: We included 25 RCTs (4,070 participants): 23 contributed to pooled meta-analyses. Across 25 trials, the mean age ranged from 0.4 to 39.3 years, reflecting pediatric-only and mixed-age RCTs; 43.8% were female. In placebo/no-therapy-controlled trials (mainly add-on studies), LEV was associated with higher seizure freedom (RD 11.0%; 95% CI 5.3%-16.7%) and responder rates (RD 24.3%; 95% CI 19.1%-29.4%). In active-comparator-controlled trials (mainly monotherapy head-to-head studies), LEV showed no overall advantage vs active comparators for seizure freedom (RD -2.4%; 95% CI -5.6% to 0.7%) or responder rate (RD -7.4%; 95% CI -23.0% to 8.1%). Fourteen trials were at high risk of bias. Sensitivity analyses confirmed benefit vs placebo but showed significant disadvantage vs active comparators in low risk-of-bias trials. Findings in pediatric-only trials (16 RCTs; 1,380 participants) were consistent with the overall results.

Discussion: LEV confers benefit vs placebo, mostly as adjunctive therapy, but does not consistently outperform established ASMs in pediatric epilepsies and may be inferior in some subgroups when higher-quality evidence is considered. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, frequent high risk of bias, variable follow-up durations, publication bias, and limited pediatric-only comparative data.

Child euthanasia in the Netherlands

A terminally ill child under the age of 12 was euthanized in the Netherlands for the first time — two years after a major change to the country’s assisted dying laws came into force.

Dutch Health Minister Sophie Hermans said the “incurably ill” child died last year, but didn’t reveal details about their age or illness during her annual report presentation to the House of Representatives on Monday, according to NOS.

Prosecutors will now decide whether the doctor involved in the case acted legally, Hermans revealed in a letter to the lawmakers.

The Dutch government legalized euthanasia for severely ill children between the ages of 1 and 12 in 2024.

“Euthanasia is only allowed for patients whose unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement has a medical dimension,” the government says.

“This can be the case with somatic diseases such as cancer or cardiovascular disease, but also with psychiatric disorders, dementia or multiple geriatric syndromes.”

Euthanasia is not permitted “in cases where a person is ‘finished with life’ or deems their life to be ‘completed,'” according to the Dutch government.

Doctors must consult a six point checklist before deciding whether to end a patient’s life under the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act.

First, they must rule that the patient is not under duress and decide whether their “suffering is unbearable with no prospect of improvement,” according to the government.

They must have informed the patient about their illness, and conclude there’s “no reasonable alternative.”

Physicians must also consult with an independent doctor, as well as exercise due care and attention throughout the process.

For children under 12, parents must give their consent.

Government ministers said at the time the law change would apply to around five to 10 children, who suffer unbearably from their illnesses.

“The end of life for this group is the only reasonable alternative to the child’s unbearable and hopeless suffering,” the government said.

Euthanasia was already legal for babies under 1 and children over 12, but kids between those ages could only die via palliative sedation or naturally.

For children between the ages of 12 and 15, parents or guardians must consent to the process, but this doesn’t apply in cases involving 16 and 17-year-olds.

They must be consulted, but their consent is not necessary, according to the Dutch government.

Doctors who perform euthanasia unlawfully risk up to 12 years in prison, and could also be slapped with a fine.

In 2002, the Netherlands was the first country in the world to legalise euthanasia under strict conditions. All cases of euthanasia must be reported to medical review boards.

The Netherlands isn’t the first country to allow doctor-assisted death for children of all ages. Belgium has allowed it since 2014.

Last year, 10,341 deaths by assisted suicide or euthanasia were reported in the Netherlands, according to the Regional Euthanasia Review Committees. This was a 3.8% rise compared to 2024. 

Around 85% of cases involved patients battling illnesses such as cancer and lung disease. Three in every four cases involved people over 70.

There was only one teenager – aged between 12 and 18 – who died from euthanasia.

Meanwhile, in the UK, a proposed bill that would’ve allowed terminally ill adults in England and Wales to choose to end their lives failed to clear the House of Lords – even though it was backed by elected parliamentarians.

The bill failed in April after parliamentary time ran out following an effective filibuster by those in the UK’s upper chamber.

Chris Bradford

https://nypost.com/2026/06/24/world-news/netherlands-euthanizes-child-under-12-in-first-case-since-major-law-change-reports/


Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Low diagnostic yield of presurgical genetic testing in adult patients with epilepsy

Jünemann C, Stuart A, Kaur N, Wiebe S, Jette N, Singh S, Borlot F, Knake S; Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program Collaborators; Billie Au PY, Klein KM. Low diagnostic yield of presurgical genetic testing in adult patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1002/epi.70291. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 42157695.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for epilepsy.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study including 115 adult patients who underwent presurgical evaluation in the Calgary Epilepsy Program between 2019 and 2023 and who had undergone research exome sequencing. A curated epilepsy gene panel comprising 765 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-listed epilepsy-associated genes was applied. Variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines and assessed for clinical relevance and association with postsurgical outcomes.

Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5, NPRL2, KCNT2, and PRRT2 were identified, respectively, in 4 individuals (3.5%, 4/115). All variants met stringent quality criteria with high pathogenicity scores (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) 34-37) and absent or extremely low population frequencies in gnomAD v4.1. None of these patients had intellectual disability, and only one patient (PRRT2) had a positive family history. The patient with the KCNT2 variant underwent epilepsy surgery with good outcome (Engel class ID).

Significance: This presurgical cohort demonstrates a low diagnostic yield of genetic testing in adult epilepsy surgery candidates. However, three of four patients with (likely) pathogenic variants did not have features that would have prompted clinical genetic testing, indicating that their genetic diagnosis would have been missed based on typical clinical genetic testing criteria in many jurisdictions.

DEPDC5-related epilepsy

Inspired by a patient

Rb R, Ajith A, Nayak A, Radhakrishnan A, Thomas B, Kesavadas C. Neuroimaging spectrum of GATOR1-related epilepsy (GATORopathies). Neuroradiology. 2026 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s00234-026-04036-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 42149211.

Abstract

Background: The mTOR pathway is important for neurodevelopment. The GATOR1 complex, composed of DEPDC5, NPRL2, and NPRL3, functions as a negative regulator of mTORC1 activity and pathogenic variants in the genes which comprise this complex cause focal epilepsy and malformation of cortical development, all named as GATORopathies. While focal cortical dysplasia is commonly reported, the full spectrum of associated neuroimaging findings remains incompletely defined.

Objective: To characterize the neuroimaging features associated with GATOR1 complex mutations and to explore potential associations between imaging phenotypes and specific genotypes.

Methods: MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed from January 2019 to December 2025 in patients with genetically confirmed GATOR1 mutations. Clinical, radiological, and genetic data were analyzed to identify imaging patterns and genotype-phenotype correlations.

Results: Twenty patients (median age : 6 years; range 1-25 years) were included. DEPDC5 mutations were most frequent (n = 12), followed by NPRL3 (n = 5) and NPRL2 (n = 3). MRI abnormalities were identified in 16 patients (80%). Focal cortical malformations were the most common finding (n = 8), followed by diffuse cortical malformations (n = 5) and generalized neuroparenchymal atrophy (n = 3); four patients had MRI-negative studies. Imaging findings varied considerably across genotypes. DEPDC5 and NPRL2 mutations showed a broad and heterogeneous radiological spectrum, whereas NPRL3 mutations showed a tendency toward cortical malformations, though the small subgroup size limits interpretation. Seizure onset spanned from infancy to adulthood; however, patients with diffuse cortical abnormalities or generalized neuroparenchymal atrophy tended to present earlier and experienced a greater seizure burden.

Conclusion: GATOR1-related epilepsy demonstrates substantial variability in neuroimaging and electroclinical features, extending beyond focal cortical malformations to include diffuse cortical malformations, generalized neuroparenchymal atrophy, and MRI-negative presentations. These findings highlight the value of integrated genetic, imaging, and electroclinical assessment in routine clinical practice.

Yang T, Banerjee R, Scheper M, Jiang M, Dai S, Aronica E, Wang Y. Ectopically overexpressed glycine transporter 2 contributes to epileptogenesis in DEPDC5-related epilepsy. Exp Neurol. 2026 May;399:115668. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2026.115668. Epub 2026 Jan 24. PMID: 41587632.

Abstract

Loss-of-function mutations in DEPDC5 (DEP domain-containing protein 5), a critical negative regulator of mTORC1 (mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1), are often identified in patients with refractory epilepsy. To understand its underlying pathogenesis and develop novel therapeutics, we used a highly clinically relevant rat model of DEPDC5-related epilepsy and resected human patient tissues to profile the molecular architecture in the dysplastic cortex. We report here that Slc6a5 (solute carrier family 6 member 5 gene), a marker gene for glycinergic inhibitory neurons, is ectopically overexpressed in mutant excitatory neurons in both experimental animal and human tissues. Using CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) in utero electroporation (IUE) to simultaneously knock out Depdc5 and Slc6a5 in forebrain excitatory neurons reduces seizure frequency and duration. These data suggest that SLC6A5 plays an important role in the epileptogenesis of DEPDC5-related epilepsy, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Samanta D. DEPDC5-related epilepsy: A comprehensive review. Epilepsy Behav. 2022 May;130:108678. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108678. Epub 2022 Apr 14. PMID: 35429726.

Abstract

DEPDC5-related epilepsy, caused by pathogenic germline variants(with or without additional somatic variants in the brain) of DEPDC5 (Dishevelled, Egl-10 and Pleckstrin domain-containing protein 5) gene, is a newly discovered predominantly focal epilepsy linked to enhanced mTORC1 pathway. DEPDC5-related epilepsy includes several familial epilepsy syndromes, including familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF) and rare sporadic nonlesional focal epilepsy. DEPDC5 has been identified as one of the more common epilepsy genes linked to infantile spasms and sudden unexpected death (SUDEP). Although intelligence usually is unaffected in DEPDC5-related epilepsy, some people have been diagnosed with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, and other psychiatric problems. DEPDC5 variants have also been found in 20% of individuals with various brain abnormalities, challenging the traditional distinction between lesional and nonlesional epilepsies. The most exciting development of DEPDC5 variants is the possibility of precision therapeutics using mTOR inhibitors, as evidenced with phenotypic rescue in many animal models. However, more research is needed to better understand the functional impact of diverse (particularly missense or splice-region) variants, the specific involvement of DEPDC5 in epileptogenesis, and the creation and utilization of precision therapies in humans. Precision treatments for DEPDC5-related epilepsy will benefit not only a small number of people with the condition, but they will also pave the way for new therapeutic approaches in epilepsy (including acquired epilepsies in which mTORC1 activation occurs, for example, post-traumatic epilepsy) and other neurological disorders involving a dysfunctional mTOR pathway.

Gu C, Wei X, Yan D, Cai Y, Li D, Shu J, Cai C. DEPDC5 plays a vital role in epilepsy: Genotypic and phenotypic features in cohort and literature. Epileptic Disord. 2024 Jun;26(3):341-349. doi: 10.1002/epd2.20223. Epub 2024 May 16. PMID: 38752894.

Abstract

Objective: DEPDC5 emerges to play a vital role in focal epilepsy. However, genotype-phenotype correlation in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies is challenging and controversial. In this study, we aim to investigate the genotypic and phenotypic features in DEPDC5-affected patients.

Methods: Genetic testing combined with criteria published by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP), was used to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 among the cohort of 479 patients with focal epilepsy. Besides, the literature review was performed to explore the genotype-phenotype correlation and the penetrance in DEPDC5-related focal epilepsies.

Results: Eight unrelated probands were revealed to carry different pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5 and the total prevalence of DEPDC5-related focal epilepsy was 1.67% in the cohort. Sixty-five variants from 28 studies were included in our review. Combined with the cases reported, null variants accounted for a larger proportion than missense variants and were related to unfavorable prognosis (drug resistance or even sudden unexpected death in epilepsy; χ2 = 5.429, p = .020). And, the prognosis of probands with developmental delay/intellectual disability or focal cortical dysplasia was worse than that of probands with simple epilepsy (χ2 = -, p = .006). Besides, the overall penetrance of variants in DEPDC5 was 68.96% (231/335).

Significance: The study expands the variant spectrum of DEPDC5 and proves that the DEPDC5 variant plays a significant role in focal epilepsy. Due to the characteristics of phenotypic heterogeneity and incomplete penetrance, genetic testing is necessary despite no specific family history. And we propose to adopt the ACMG/AMP criteria refined by ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group, for consistency in usage and transparency in classification rationale. Moreover, we reveal an important message to clinicians that the prognosis of DEPDC5-affected patients is related to the variant type and complications.

Bacq A, Roussel D, Bonduelle T, Zagaglia S, Maletic M, Ribierre T, Adle-Biassette H, Marchal C, Jennesson M, An I; Genomics England Research Consortium; Picard F, Navarro V, Sisodiya SM, Baulac S. Cardiac Investigations in Sudden Unexpected Death in DEPDC5-Related Epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2022 Jan;91(1):101-116. doi: 10.1002/ana.26256. Epub 2021 Nov 16. PMID: 34693554; PMCID: PMC9299146.

Abstract

Objective: Germline loss-of-function mutations in DEPDC5, and in its binding partners (NPRL2/3) of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) repressor GATOR1 complex, cause focal epilepsies and increase the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Here, we asked whether DEPDC5 haploinsufficiency predisposes to primary cardiac defects that could contribute to SUDEP and therefore impact the clinical management of patients at high risk of SUDEP.

Methods: Clinical cardiac investigations were performed in 16 patients with pathogenic variants in DEPDC5, NPRL2, or NPRL3. Two novel Depdc5 mouse strains, a human HA-tagged Depdc5 strain and a Depdc5 heterozygous knockout with a neuron-specific deletion of the second allele (Depdc5c/- ), were generated to investigate the role of Depdc5 in SUDEP and cardiac activity during seizures.

Results: Holter, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic (ECG) examinations provided no evidence for altered clinical cardiac function in the patient cohort, of whom 3 DEPDC5 patients succumbed to SUDEP and 6 had a family history of SUDEP. There was no cardiac injury at autopsy in a postmortem DEPDC5 SUDEP case. The HA-tagged Depdc5 mouse revealed expression of Depdc5 in the brain, heart, and lungs. Simultaneous electroencephalographic-ECG records on Depdc5c/- mice showed that spontaneous epileptic seizures resulting in a SUDEP-like event are not preceded by cardiac arrhythmia.

Interpretation: Mouse and human data show neither structural nor functional cardiac damage that might underlie a primary contribution to SUDEP in the spectrum of DEPDC5-related epilepsies. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:101-116.

Uncovering common genetic risk factors in migraine and epilepsy through whole exome sequencing


Sahu P, Kashyap S, Kumar A, Munshi A. Uncovering common genetic risk factors in migraine and epilepsy through whole exome sequencing. Epileptic Disord. 2026 Apr;28(2):314-332. doi: 10.1002/epd2.70147. Epub 2025 Dec 12. PMID: 41386636.

Abstract

Background: Migraine and epilepsy are distinct neurological disorders that co-occur as comorbid conditions as well. Despite their clinical differences, these disorders exhibit some overlapping symptoms and share underlying pathophysiological mechanisms driven by a common genetic contribution.

Aim: The current study aimed to explore the genetic predisposition associated with epilepsy, migraine, and their comorbidity in both familial and sporadic cases.

Methods: Whole exome sequencing carried out in 191 individuals, comprising familial and sporadic cases diagnosed with migraine (n = 63), epilepsy (n = 62), and comorbid (n = 39) involving unaffected first-degree relatives (n = 16) and healthy controls (n = 11). Variant interpretation was performed in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Segregation analysis was carried out by Sanger sequencing.

Results: Clinically relevant pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were observed in the genes associated with ion channel functioning and neurotransmitter regulation in migraine as well as in epilepsy. Apart from these, variations in other genes regulating glucose transport, synaptic organization and signaling were also identified. In the epilepsy group, variants were detected in sodium channel genes (SCN1A, SCN1B, SCN2A), G protein-coupled receptor (ADGRV1), GLUT-1, and GABA transporters (SLC2A1, SLC6A1), synaptic transporter (STXBP1), and others (ICK, EFHC1, SETD1B, and DEPDC5). In the migraine group, genes including ion channel encoding gene (SCN9A, ATP1A2), GABA receptor-encoding gene (GABRA5) were noted. In individuals with migraine and epilepsy comorbidity alterations were observed in ion channel encoding gene (SCN1A, KCNMA1, and KIF1A) and other gene (COL4A1) highlighting that ion channel genes are common genetic markers shared by all three disorders.

Conclusion: The identified variants predominantly involve genes encoding sodium, potassium, and GABA receptors that result in ion channel dysfunction and neurotransmitter imbalance. These findings highlight shared molecular pathways contributing to the pathogenesis of epilepsy, migraine, and their comorbidity. The convergence of genetic factors suggests potential avenues for the development of unified therapeutic strategies.

Monday, June 22, 2026

Schinzel-Giedion syndrome redux

Inspired by a patient

Duis J, Agresta L, Bennett WE Jr, Chambers H, Clarke A, Fairhurst C, Hoover-Fong J, Murphy F, Noritz G, Schwantes S, Shreve M, Thusang K, Weidemann D, Beale R, Mehta A, Wilhelmsen A, Summerfield N. International Expert Opinion on Standard of Care for Patients With Schinzel-Giedion Syndrome: A Modified Delphi Study. Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Jun;197(6):e64015. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.64015. Epub 2025 Feb 19. PMID: 39967563.

Abstract

Schinzel-Giedion Syndrome (SGS) is an ultra-rare, multisystem, genetic developmental disorder caused by gain-of-function pathogenic variants in the SETBP1 gene. No standard of care (SoC) recommendations currently exist. To assess expert opinion on SoC for individuals with SGS using a modified Delphi method. A multidisciplinary panel of 21 experts from the USA and Europe was assembled. Experts responded to a two-round questionnaire, with a subgroup participating in a virtual workshop, through which recommendations pertaining to the diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, and management of SGS were iteratively developed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% of respondents demonstrating agreement/disagreement with 6-point Likert scale questions, or ≥ 70% of respondents selecting a given multiple-choice question option. Overall, 81/94 statements achieved consensus. Experts agreed that the recommendations should be considered applicable to any individual with confirmed SGS or an indicative phenotype and any SETBP1 gain-of-function mutation. Key considerations included early and sustained involvement of a multidisciplinary team, routine monitoring for common tumors, neurologic, renal, genitourinary, pulmonary, musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal manifestations/complications, and facilitation of shared decision-making processes. These recommendations should help guide clinicians and families/caregivers in care decisions to enhance quality and duration of life for individuals with SGS and facilitate shared decision-making.

Takeuchi A, Okamoto N, Fujinaga S, Morita H, Shimizu J, Akiyama T, Ninomiya S, Takanashi J, Kubo T. Progressive brain atrophy in Schinzel-Giedion syndrome with a SETBP1 mutation. Eur J Med Genet. 2015 Aug;58(8):369-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 19. PMID: 26096993.

Abstract

Schinzel-Giedion syndrome is a rare congenital malformation syndrome. Recently, SETBP1 was identified as the causative gene. Herein, we present a Japanese boy with Schinzel-Giedion syndrome resulting from a novel mutation in SETBP1 in order to establish the clinical features and serial MRI findings associated with the syndrome. On the third day of life, the boy was referred to our hospital because of facial abnormalities and feeding difficulty. Midfacial retraction, frontal bossing, deep groove under the eyes, upturned nose, low-set ears, bilateral cryptorchidism, and generalized hypertrichosis were identified on admission. At the age of 7 months, epileptic spasms in series occurred. Based on characteristic facial and skeletal abnormalities and severe developmental delay, we clinically diagnosed him with Schinzel-Giedion syndrome. Direct sequencing of the SETBP1 gene revealed a heterozygous mutation (p.Ile871Ser) in exon 4. Although neither cardiac defect nor choanal stenosis were present in our case, the phenotype of our case was nearly identical to those of previously reported cases confirmed by genetic analysis. Serial MRI from the age of 1 month-3 years revealed progressive brain atrophy, especially in the white matter and basal ganglia. However, myelination was age-appropriate and no obvious abnormal signals in the white matter were seen. Diffusion weighted imaging revealed no abnormal findings. Accumulation of MRI data including diffusion weighted imaging from Schinzel-Giedion syndrome cases is needed to understand the mechanism underlying progressive brain atrophy in this syndrome.

Leone MP, Palumbo P, Palumbo O, Di Muro E, Chetta M, Laforgia N, Resta N, Stella A, Castellana S, Mazza T, Castori M, Carella M, Bukvic N. The recurrent SETBP1 c.2608G > A, p.(Gly870Ser) variant in a patient with Schinzel-Giedion syndrome: an illustrative case of the utility of whole exome sequencing in a critically ill neonate. Ital J Pediatr. 2020 May 27;46(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00839-y. PMID: 32460883; PMCID: PMC7254667.

Abstract

Background: Schinzel-Giedion syndrome (SGS) is a multiple malformation syndrome mainly characterized by severe intellectual disability, distinctive facial features, and multiple congenital anomalies, including skeletal abnormalities, genitourinary and renal malformations, cardiac defects, as well as an increased pediatric cancer risk. Recently, SGS has been associated with de novo heterozygous deleterious variants in the SETBP1 gene; to date, nine different variants, clustering in exon 4 of SETBP1, have been identified in 25 patients.

Case presentation: In this study, by using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), we identified a patient with a recurrent missense mutation in SETBP1, the c.2608G > A, p.(Gly870Ser) variant, previously reported as likely pathogenic. This finding allowed us to confirm the suspected clinical diagnosis of SGS. Clinical features of patients carrying the same variant, including our patient, were evaluated by a review of medical records.

Conclusions: Our study confirms SGS as a severe disorder potentially presenting at birth as a critically ill neonate and demonstrates the causal role of the c.2608G > A, p.(Gly870Ser) variant in the etiology of the syndrome. Moreover, although the cohort of SETBP1-patients reported in the literature is still small, our study reports for the first time the prevalence of the variant (about 27%, 7/26). Finally, given the heterogeneity of clinical presentations of affected patients hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) and/or Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU), in agreement with emerging data from the literature, we suggest that WES should be used in the diagnosis of unexplained syndromic conditions, and even as part of a standard first-line diagnostic approach, as it would allow a better diagnosis, counseling and management of affected patients and their families.

See: https://childnervoussystem.blogspot.com/2026/05/schinzel-giedion-syndrome.html

Friday, June 19, 2026

Child Neurology Society statement on Dobbs v Jackson and my response

Dobbs v Jackson

A Statement from the Child Neurology Foundation (CNF) & Child Neurology Society (CNS)

The Child Neurology Foundation (CNF) and the Child Neurology Society (CNS) work on behalf of children and families living with neurologic conditions within the United States, and the child neurologists who care for them. As the leading organizations representing
the child neurology community, we stand firm in our commitment that all have access to safe, equitable and quality healthcare, including medical termination of pregnancy-abortion. We are persistent in our belief of the essential and critical relationship between a patient and their health care professional, and boldly guard against any intrusion.

Medical decisions are intricate and complex, particularly when neurological conditions are involved. Our community faces care decisions related to pregnancies affected by congenital, genetic, life-threatening anomalies, or in persons with intellectual and developmental impairment who live with a higher risk for sexual assault. Moreover, our health care professionals commonly manage medicines known to be correlated with a higher risk of birth defects. We affirm that all medical decisions should occur between the health care professional, patient, and their caregiver. Therefore, we are deeply concerned with a growing number of states reacting to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision with legislation that impedes health care professionals from optimally and equitably serving their patients and caregivers.

Guided by compassion and medical expertise, we remain steadfast in our support of the child neurology community – keeping our patients and their families at the center of our work.

Anup Patel, MD

President

Child Neurology Foundation

Bruce Cohen, MD

President

Child Neurology Society


My response:

From: Galen Breningstall
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2022 12:02 PM
To: bcohen@akronchildrens.org <bcohen@akronchildrens.org>; anup.patel@nationwidechildrens.org <anup.patel@nationwidechildrens.org>
Subject: Dobbs v Jackson statement

I cannot in good conscience accept the Dobbs v Jackson statement of the Child Neurology Society or remain a member of an organization where this is the official position of the organization. "As the leading organizations representing the child neurology community, we stand firm in our commitment that all have access to safe, equitable and quality healthcare, including medical termination of pregnancy - abortion. We are persistent in our belief of the essential and critical relationship between a patient and their health care professional, and boldly guard against any intrusion."  I do not believe that the "essential and critical relationship between a patient and their health care professional" should be protected "against any intrusion". In recent political discussion regarding the abortion issue it has been abundantly clear than any mother who wishes to kill her baby, for whatever frivolous reason and at whatever gestation, will find a medical professional willing to accommodate her. This is an abomination and warrants legal protection for the unborn child.