Magostini F, Paris G, Capuano A. Phenomenology and clinical relevance of minor neurological signs in child neurology and psychiatry. Front Neurol. 2026 May 8;17:1761780. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1761780. PMID: 42180220; PMCID: PMC13193831.
Abstract
Minor Neurological Signs, also referred to as neurological soft signs, are subtle abnormalities detected during neurological examination that do not meet criteria for major focal deficits. They are increasingly considered indicators of variability in neurodevelopment, likely reflecting differences in sensorimotor integration and maturation of cortico–subcortical networks. This mini review summarizes current evidence on the phenomenology, neurobiological correlates, and clinical relevance of MNS in child neurology and psychiatry. MNS include motor features such as overflow movements, dysmetria, dysrhythmia, and mild alterations in coordination, tone, and balance. Their assessment relies on standardized, developmentally appropriate tools that support identification of distinct patterns of dysfunction. MNS are frequently reported in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions. While not diagnostically specific, they have been associated with symptom severity and functional outcomes. Further longitudinal and integrative studies are needed to clarify their developmental trajectories, neurobiological mechanisms, and potential clinical utility.
From the article:
In line with the movement disorders classification and subsequent classification efforts in the field of minor neurological signs, we can identify the following phenomenological categories:
1) Hyperkinetic movement disorders: these are characterized by involuntary movements, primarily manifesting as tremors, choreiform movements, and dystonic postures.
a) Tremor: defined as a rhythmic, oscillatory movement of a body part, resulting from alternating or synchronous contractions of antagonist muscles, and may occur at rest, during posture, or during action.
b) Choreiform movements: frequently described as “dance-like” or “piano playing movements”, consist of brief, irregular, non-rhythmic, and unpredictable movements that flow randomly from one body part to another, predominantly affecting the distal extremities. These movements are not suppressible and are characterized by variability in timing, amplitude, and distribution.
c) Dystonia: characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal, often repetitive movements or postures. These movements are typically patterned, twisting, and may be triggered or worsened by voluntary action.
2) Overflow movements: these refer to involuntary movements of body parts that are not necessary to perform a motor task effectively. Notable examples include contralateral motor overflow and mirror movements.
3) Dysmetria: this is identified as an inability to control the trajectory of purposeful movements, particularly concerning coordination of the extremities.
4) Miscellaneous disturbances: this category includes mild alterations in muscle tone, abnormalities in balance and gait (e.g., tandem gait), lateralization and dysrhythmia (an impairment of motor timing and of the ability to generate, maintain, or synchronize temporal sequences of movement, resulting in irregularity in rhythmic execution and coordination).
Although individually non-specific, these signs reflect variations in the organization and integration of distributed sensorimotor networks and are commonly observed within the spectrum of minor neurological signs...
The systematic observation of MNS provides clinically relevant information on the functional organization of developing neural systems involved in motor control and sensory integration. Rather than directly informing etiology, MNS can be understood as observable markers of variability in the organization and functioning of subcortical and cortico–subcortical systems. However, their clinical relevance is often underestimated and not always fully recognized during assessment, despite their potential to support early identification of risk in children who do not yet meet full diagnostic criteria but present emerging signs of neurodevelopmental vulnerability.
In the clinical context, MNS should be conceptualized as structured, domain-specific configurations of signs that support the identification of neurodevelopmental subgroups. MNS can be interpreted as intermediate phenotypes along a spectrum that includes, on one end, transient maturational variations and, on the other, conditions characterized by structural and persistent deficits, such as cerebral palsy.
The systematic assessment of MNS using standardized and specific tools is essential to clinical practice. Recognizing MNS as central components of neurodevelopmental assessment may improve early diagnosis, refine phenotypic stratification, and support the implementation of earlier and more tailored interventions in neurodevelopmental disorders.






