Abstract
Background: There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days.
Results: Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates.
Conclusions: The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.
Chourasia N, Dohmeier J, Curry J, Parkhurst S, Mudigoudar B, Rivas-Coppola M, Wheless J. Clinical Experience With Lacosamide as an Adjunct Treatment for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Pediatr Neurol. 2024 Aug;157:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 Jun 5. PMID: 38917517.
Abstract
Background: Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) currently approved for the treatment of focal seizures in children aged greater than one month. There are limited data on its efficacy in the neonatal age group. We describe our experience with LCM as an adjunct ASM for the treatment of neonatal seizures.
Methods: A retrospective chart review over a five-year period (2018 to 2022) was conducted at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital to identify neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-proven seizures who were treated with LCM. Data were collected on electroclinical seizure characteristics, underlying etiology, ASMs, treatment response, and any adverse effects.
Results: A total of 15 neonates with EEG-confirmed seizures who were treated with LCM were included. Ten neonates achieved seizure cessation after LCM was added to their ASM regimen consisting of phenobarbital, levetiracetam, or both. No new treatment-related adverse effects were noted.
Conclusions: LCM is effective as an adjunct treatment for neonatal seizures. Randomized controlled studies are needed to establish its effectiveness and adequate dosing regimen in this population.
Jewell TI, Carrasco M, Hsu DA, Knox AT. Lacosamide Boluses Decreased Seizure Burden and Were Well Tolerated in Neonates With Acute Seizures: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series. J Child Neurol. 2025 Feb;40(2):116-122. doi: 10.1177/08830738241286108. Epub 2024 Oct 14. PMID: 39397495; PMCID: PMC11781981.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal seizures are associated with worsened neurodevelopmental outcomes. Phenobarbital, the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for neonatal seizures, can cause neuronal apoptosis and may worsen neurodevelopmental outcomes. Lacosamide may be an efficacious treatment for neonatal seizures. Methods: We assessed the impact of lacosamide boluses on seizure burden in a retrospective cohort of 15 neonates monitored with video electroencephalography (EEG). Medication bolus times and seizure start/end times on EEG tracings determined change in seizure burden. Results: Seven patients received lacosamide as first- or second-line treatment and 8 as third-line or later. Average 4-hour seizure burden decreased from 13% to 3% following lacosamide boluses (P = .002). Reduction in seizure burden greater than 30% followed 79% of boluses. Lacosamide was well tolerated; one patient experienced mild asymptomatic episodic bradycardia that medication taper resolved. Conclusions: Lacosamide significantly decreased seizure burden in this cohort. Prospective studies of lacosamide treatment for neonatal seizures are warranted.
Cortes-Ledesma C, Arias-Vivas E, Ruiz-OcaƱa de Las Cuevas G, Santana-Cabrera E, Garcia-Ron A. Clinical Impact and Safety Profile of Intravenous Lacosamide Administration as Adjunctive Therapy for Neonatal Seizures. J Child Neurol. 2025 Apr;40(4):291-295. doi: 10.1177/08830738241296177. Epub 2024 Nov 14. PMID: 39539162.
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective descriptive study was to evaluate the clinical impact and safety profile of lacosamide in neonates with symptomatic refractory seizures.Patients diagnosed with symptomatic refractory seizures who received lacosamide were included in the study. Follow-up assessments were conducted until 24 months of age, during which data on lacosamide dosage, duration of exposure, concurrent treatments, and potential side effects were collected. A total of eight patients were enrolled, with lacosamide administered as a third- or fourth-line treatment for symptomatic refractory seizures. Following loading dose, 62.5% of the patients achieved complete remission of seizure activity without recurrence. In the remaining cases, a reduction in seizure frequency was observed. No adverse effects attributable to lacosamide were reported.In conclusion, lacosamide may be effective in achieving seizure remission in newborns with symptomatic refractory seizures, and all patients demonstrate excellent tolerance. Brief exposure to lacosamide was sufficient, and no adverse effects were observed up to 24 months of age. However, randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.