Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Clinical signatures of genetic epilepsies precede diagnosis in electronic medical records

Galer PD, Parthasarathy S, Xian J, McKee JL, Ruggiero SM, Ganesan S, Kaufman MC, Cohen SR, Haag S, Chen C, Ojemann WKS, Kim D, Wilmarth O, Vaidiswaran P, Sederman C, Ellis CA, Gonzalez AK, Boßelmann CM, Lal D, Sederman R, Lewis-Smith D, Litt B, Helbig I. Clinical Signatures of Genetic Epilepsies Precede Diagnosis in Electronic Medical Records of 32 000 Individuals. Genet Med. 2024101211. doi:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101211. PMID: 39011766

Purpose: An early genetic diagnosis can guide the time-sensitive treatment of individuals with genetic epilepsies. However, most genetic diagnoses occur long after disease onset. We aimed to identify early clinical features suggestive of genetic diagnoses in individuals with epilepsy through large-scale analysis of full-text electronic medical records (EMRs). Methods: We extracted 89 million time-stamped standardized clinical annotations using Natural Language Processing from 4,572,783 clinical notes from 32 112 individuals with childhood epilepsy, including 1925 individuals with known or presumed genetic epilepsies. We applied these features to train random forest models to predict SCN1A-related disorders and any genetic diagnosis. Results: We identified 47 774 age-dependent associations of clinical features with genetic etiologies a median of 3.6 years prior to molecular diagnosis. Across all 710 genetic etiologies identified in our cohort, neurodevelopmental differences between 6 and 9 months increased the likelihood of a later molecular diagnosis fivefold (P < .0001, 95% CI = 3.55-7.42). A later diagnosis of SCN1A-related disorders (AUC = 0.91) or an overall positive genetic diagnosis (AUC = 0.82) could be reliably predicted using random forest models. Conclusion: Clinical features predictive of genetic epilepsies precede molecular diagnoses by up to several years in conditions with known precision treatments. An earlier diagnosis facilitated by automated EMR analysis has the potential for earlier targeted therapeutic strategies in the genetic epilepsies.

Commentary on the above:

Li Y. Predicting Pediatric Genetic Epilepsy Through Electronic Medical Records: A Data-Driven Biomarker Discovery Approach. Epilepsy Currents. 2024;0(0). doi:10.1177/15357597241290322

With the goal to identify key clinical features linked to genetic epilepsy syndromes and predict genetic diagnoses, Galer et al extracted clinical notes from the electronic medical record (EMR) system of 32 112 individuals diagnosed with childhood epilepsy, including 1925 individuals with known or presumed genetic epilepsies at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Care Network between 2010 and 2022. A customized natural language processing (NLP) pipeline was utilized to help extract clinical features in the form of Language System codes. These features were subsequently mapped onto the Human Phenotype Ontology and segmented into 3-month age bins for analysis. A conservative framework was developed to analyze only clinical notes before an individual's genetic diagnosis, with additional analysis using cumulative time binning. Furthermore, validation was conducted by collecting phenotype data from individuals with SCN1A-related epilepsy disorders and control groups in two different cohorts, analyzing the most significant neurological phenotypes associated with SCN1A-related epilepsy and employing random forest models for prediction. In their study, causative genetic etiologies were found in 38% of individuals with known or presumed genetic epilepsy, involving 271 unique genes, with 87 occurring in two or more individuals. The median time from the first neurological abnormality to genetic diagnosis was 1.4 years in their cohort. The earliest clinical feature associated with a genetic diagnosis occurred a median of 3.62 years before the median age of genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, broad clinical features that predict positive genetic diagnoses independent of molecular etiology were identified, including muscular hypotonia between 1 and 1.25 years, neurodevelopmental abnormality between 6 and 9 months, and neurodevelopmental delay between 6 and 9 months.
The study offers valuable insights into the clinical applicability of predictive models for genetic diagnoses in epilepsy. The utilization of NLP allows for the extraction of data from real-world observations, facilitating the mapping of clinical phenotype trajectories in genetic epilepsies over time. This not only tracks the natural history overtime but also enables the identification of novel pathognomonic clinical features. Such an approach is especially beneficial for rare genetic disorders, enabling the discovery of unprecedented details that may have been previously overlooked. Additionally, the study highlights the promising combination of NLP with machine learning models to identify significant clinical phenotypes. This integrated approach may aid in predicting genetic diagnoses at an earlier age, offering potential for the application of precision medicine in epilepsy care.
Early recognition of diagnosis and optimized treatment has been one of the fundamental objectives in medical care to improve patient outcomes and enhance overall healthcare cost-effectiveness. Large-scale modeling of EMR trajectories have been developed for various common medical conditions such as sepsis, heart failure, and cancer, among others. These models leverage current advancements in large language models and deep learning technologies to drive forward the field of precision medicine. While early diagnosis of genetic epilepsies is crucial for timely treatment, the practicality and cost-effectiveness of such an approach would need further research. It is anticipated that clinical features or a combination thereof could be utilized to identify patients highly likely to have a genetic cause, prompting further genetic testing for confirmation or even consideration of empirical treatment when genetic testing is not an option in resource-limited scenarios. However, there is a need for ongoing evaluation of the potential for false positive identifications within EMR systems based on this proposed algorithm. Additionally, the cost implications and overall cost-effectiveness of these approaches warrant further investigation.
Furthermore, when considering the application of these discoveries beyond SCN1A syndromes, integrating them into clinical practice may encounter limitations in generalizability resulting from data heterogeneity or data insufficiency, which is one of the common challenges for prediction models based on EMR trajectories. The algorithms trained on pediatric epilepsy patients within a tertiary center network may present variations in specific terms or syndromes compared to the documentation practices of general neurologists or adult neurologists. These discrepancies could be from less detailed history reviews by general providers or inadequate data due to recall bias among patients and their guardians, ultimately leading to underdocumented clinical symptoms. For instance, specific symptoms like muscular hypotonia at a younger age between 1 and 1.25 years, identified as an independent clinical biomarker for genetic epilepsy diagnosis in this study, might not be consistently recorded due to recall bias related to their remote occurrence within families in adult neurology practice. Additionally, adult-onset genetic epilepsies exhibit unique genetic mutations and clinical features that can notably differ from those observed in childhood epilepsy cases. Therefore, further expansion of the training and application of similar methodologies across diverse populations holds significant promise in offering valuable insights in the field.

The role of default mode network connectivity in the onset of FCD-related focal epilepsy

Macdonald-Laurs E, Warren AEL, Leventer RJ, Harvey, AS. Why Did My Seizures Start Now? Influences of Lesion Connectivity and Genetic Etiology on Age at Seizure Onset in Focal Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 2024,65(6):1644–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17947

Objective: Patients with focal, lesional epilepsy present with seizures at variable ages. Larger lesion size and overlap with sensorimotor or default mode network (DMN) have been associated with younger age at seizure onset in cohorts with mixed types of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Here, we studied determinants of age at seizure onset in patients with bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia (BOSD), a discrete type of FCD with highly localized epileptogenicity. Methods: Eighty-four patients (77% operated) with BOSD were studied. Demographic, histopathologic, and genetic findings were recorded. BOSD volume and anatomical, primary versus association, rostral versus caudal, and functional network locations were determined. Normative functional connectivity analyses were performed using each BOSD as a region of interest in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data of healthy children. Variables were correlated with age at seizure onset. Results: Median age at seizure onset was 5.4 (interquartile range = 2–7.9) years. Of 50 tested patients, 22 had somatic and nine had germline pathogenic mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway variants. Younger age at seizure onset was associated with greater BOSD volume (p = .002), presence of a germline pathogenic variant (p = .04), DMN overlap (p = .04), and increased functional connectivity with the DMN (p < .05, false discovery rate corrected). Location within the sensorimotor cortex and networks was not associated with younger age at seizure onset in our relatively small but homogenous cohort. Significance: Greater lesion size, pathogenic mTOR pathway germline variants, and DMN connectivity are associated with younger age at seizure onset in small FCD. Our findings strengthen the suggested role of DMN connectivity in the onset of FCD-related focal epilepsy and reveal novel contributions of genetic etiology.

Recurrent status epilepticus episodes

Bauer K, Rosenow F, Knake S, Willems LM, Kämppi L, Strzelczyk A. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Status Epilepticus Episodes. Neurol Res Pract. 2023;5(1):34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9

Abstract

Background:
Multiple studies have focused on medical and pharmacological treatments and outcome predictors of patients with status epilepticus (SE). However, a sufficient understanding of recurrent episodes of SE is lacking. Therefore, we reviewed recurrent SE episodes to investigate their clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with relapses.
Methods:
In this retrospective, multicenter study, we reviewed recurrent SE patient data covering 2011 to 2017 from the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg, Germany. Clinical characteristics and outcome variables were compared among the first and subsequent SE episodes using a standardized form for data collection.
Results:
We identified 120 recurrent SE episodes in 80 patients (10.2% of all 1177 episodes). The mean age at the first SE episode was 62.2 years (median 66.5; SD 19.3; range 21–91), and 42 of these patients were male (52.5%). A mean of 262.4 days passed between the first and the second episode. Tonic–clonic seizure semiology and a cerebrovascular disease etiology were predominant in initial and recurrent episodes. After subsequent episodes, patients showed increased disability as indicated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and 9 out of 80 patients died during the second episode (11.3%). Increases in refractory and super-refractory SE (RSE and SRSE, respectively) were noted during the second episode, and the occurrence of a non-refractory SE (NRSE) during the first SE episode did not necessarily provide a protective marker for subsequent non-refractory episodes. An increase in the use of intravenous-available anti-seizure medication (ASM) was observed in the treatment of SE patients. Patients were discharged from hospital with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.0 ASMs after the second SE episode and 2.1 ± 1.2 ASMs after the first episode. Levetiracetam was the most common ASM used before admission and on discharge for SE patients.
Conclusions:
This retrospective, multicenter study used the mRS to demonstrate worsened outcomes of patients at consecutive SE episodes. ASM accumulations after subsequent SE episodes were registered over the study period. The study results underline the necessity for improved clinical follow-ups and outpatient care to reduce the health care burden from recurrent SE episodes.

Commentary on the above:

Gaspard N. Double, Double Toil and Trouble: Recurrent Episodes of Status Epilepticus Are Associated With Increasingly Worse Outcomes. Epilepsy Currents. 2024;24(5):316-317. doi:10.1177/15357597231223587

The first key finding is that 10% of patients with a first episode of SE are at risk of suffering from a recurrent episode of SE, half of them within 6 months of the first episode. This figure is roughly in line with the available literature, which provides an estimate of recurrence ranging from 7.6% to 32%. Thus, the annual risk of a second episode of SE after having suffered from a first is at least 250 to 1000 times higher than the annual incidence of SE in the general population. Even though half of the episodes of SE occur in patients with epilepsy, a 10% annual risk is still higher than the risk of SE in patients with epilepsy.
This indicates an intrinsic predisposition of a subgroup of patients for their seizures to present as SE. The International League Against Epilepsy defines SE as “a condition resulting either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms, which lead to abnormally, prolonged seizures.” While these mechanisms still elude us, an individual’s predisposition for SE suggests that this could be identified by investigating patients with recurrent episodes, at the neuroanatomical, neurophysiological, and, perhaps, genetic levels. The mean age of patients in the cohort was 62 years at the time of the first episode and 63 years at the time of the second episode. This is not surprising as SE incidence peaks after 60 years. Part of it is explained by the higher incidence of acute brain injuries, such as ischemic strokes and cerebral hemorrhages, that can cause SE after 60 years. Since most patients in this cohort, and in other cohorts of recurrent SE, had remote epilepsy, it is also possible that this higher risk of SE and of SE recurrence is also in part explained by the aging of the brain, which could be accompanied by a decrease in the efficiency of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination. The risk of SE is also higher in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and uncontrolled seizures than in patients with controlled epilepsy. Whether this also affects the risk of recurrence is unclear, although a prior study found that recurrent episodes of SE were more likely in patients who took more anti-seizure medications (ASMs).
A few patients in the cohort suffered 3 or more episodes of SE. From the data presented in the article, it can be estimated that the risk of third, fourth, or fifth episode approximates 50%, which is even greater than the risk of a first recurrence. This might mean that some individuals have a particularly strong intrinsic predisposition for SE. Another possible explanation is that each SE episode durably tampers the epileptic network to make it more prone to subsequent episodes. After all, the epileptogenic effects of SE are well-known: experimental SE, by chemical or electrical mean, is a classical way to cause epilepsy in animal models and acute symptomatic SE in acute brain injuries carries a greater risk of long-term post-injury epilepsy than single acute symptomatic seizures.
The second key finding of the study is that recurring episodes of SE are associated with increasingly worse outcomes. Compared to a first episode, a second episode of SE carries a higher risk of functional decline and dependency. It also leads to an increase in the burden of anti-seizure medications, including with medications that have a less desirable profile of side effects in the elderly, such as phenytoin and valproate. However, at the time of the second episode, the mean number of ASMs taken was lower than immediately after the first episode. Although this was not formally assessed in this study, ASM withdrawal was previously identified a precipitating factor of recurrent SE. The authors thus rightfully warn us against the temptation to quickly withdraw the ASM used to manage SE. Given the risk of recurrence, seizure action plans that could be used in the out-of-hospital setting should be discussed with patients and caregivers. Such plans may include fats-acting benzodiazepines for prolonged seizures.
There was also a trend toward increasing refractoriness at the time of the second episode. Of note, this has not been found in all other studies, perhaps owing to the difference in inclusion criteria mentioned above. A prior study found that the risk of refractoriness was higher if SE episodes recurred within 6 months of the first episode, but this was probably explained a greater proportion of acute and progressive etiologies in this subgroup.