Cindy was cradling her 9-month-old son, Elias, against her
chest when she and a room full of family simultaneously yelled “Surprise!” to
an unsuspecting aunt on her birthday. The outburst shot like a bolt of
electricity through Elias. He cried for an hour.
Xander, while growing up in the perpetual sensory assault of
Manhattan, had to get off the train any time someone with a guitar entered his
subway car to play for small change.
Cal had a more enigmatic reaction to stimuli. His mother,
Jennifer, points to the oor-to-ceiling windows in her hilltop living room.
Rooftops, forests, and the San Francisco Bay spool out for miles. Cal was 2
when they moved here from a small, contained apartment. “We got here and Cal
was always running away from me,” recalls Jennifer. “He suddenly had all this
space and stimulation. He was in sensory overload.”…
[Dr. Elysa]Marco’s practice is now spilling over with SPD
kids like Elias, Xander, and Cal. She also has a significant social media
presence on a Facebook page devoted to sensory processing disorders. Her
contributions there resonate with the page’s 85,000 members, who are desperate
for answers about their children’s seemingly bizarre reactivity. And in her
lab, she is scientifically validating the life experience of SPD patients by
identifying their brains’ unique structure and function and their distinct
genetic profiles. Marco and her team have done so with great success by
leveraging leaps in imaging technology and cross-disciplinary partnerships.
Her lab’s first research breakthroughs were back-to-back
papers, published in 2013 and 2014 with UCSF radiologist Pratik Mukherjee, MD,
PhD. In the first one, Marco and Mukherjee performed brain-imaging studies on
kids with SPD, primarily boys, and compared them against typically developing
boys. In the SPD kids, they found abnormal tracts in their white matter, a part
of the brain that’s essential for perceiving, thinking, and learning. These
tracts connect the auditory, visual, and tactile systems involved in sensory
processing. It was the first time researchers had identified a biological basis
for SPD.
In the second study, they compared structural communications
in the brains of boys with SPD and boys with autism. They visualized
connections among neurons by tracking water moving through the brain’s white
matter. When water molecules move in the same direction, connections are
thought to be directional and strong, while water going against the flow is a
sign of faulty connections.
“The data was so clear. Kids with sensory processing
differences just have different degrees of connection efficiency, particularly
in the back part of the brain,” says Marco. This study was the first to show
that kids with SPD have quantifiable and distinct differences in brain
function. “These kids are not breaking down in school because their parents are
doing a bad job or because they are bad kids,” says Marco. “Their brains are
wired differently.”
Marco’s research and social media outreach is now arming
parents, teachers, and clinicians all over the country – many of whom had never
heard of SPD before – with the tools to diagnose and deliver help to kids
earlier. The papers are also a wake-up call for neurologists, pediatricians,
family, and friends who have questioned the disorder’s existence – a
bittersweet validation of what parents of SPD kids already knew. A diagnosis
that stands on hard scientific ground gives parents authority to explain rather
than apologize for their kids’ behavior. But more importantly, it gives them
license to forgive themselves – to say “I am not crazy,” as Elias’s mom, Cindy,
puts it. “And this is not my fault.”
That scientific confirmation has shifted the conversation to
finding viable treatments. Marco has developed a four-part framework for
building a safe, positive world in which SPD kids can thrive. The first two
elements – controlling kids’ environment and arousal – help parents figure out
how best to structure their children’s physical and emotional surroundings. The
third helps kids master healthier reactivity behaviors through brain training.
The last helps kids achieve calmness through medications that soften the blows
of overstimulation.
“First, I encourage parents to get an occupational
therapist,” recommends Marco, “to help them figure out both at home and at
school what environmental changes need to be done to make their lives quiet and
consistent. Because it’s the novel stuff that unseats them.” At home, that can
be as simple as organizing their room. At school, it can mean putting tennis
balls on the legs of chairs so they don’t make sudden sounds as kindergarteners
squirm.
Some schools are more accommodating than others, and parents
may find that out the hard way. Kids might be asked to leave a school, or
parents might pull them out. “About 25 percent of the kids in my clinic end up
in independent schools,” says Marco. Cal is in a small and very structured
early intervention program, offered through the public school system, that has
been incredibly effective in helping him understand the expectations of a
school environment. Other SPD kids, like Xander and Elias, are schooled at
home, either online or by teachers who come to them. Marco’s biggest takeaway
on school choice is this: You don’t want your child to have post-traumatic
stress from a school environment that can’t accommodate them. “Whether your kid
is 3, 12, or 18, you need their self-esteem intact,” she says.
Her treatment plan also calls for a healthy diet free of
simple sugars and simple carbs, a regular bedtime, and consistent exercise, all
of which help control the arousal levels of kids – and parents. “If parents are
out of control, their kids will be. As a simple start, I suggest they take 10
deep breaths if their kids start to escalate.”
Typically, kids with SPD have weekly occupational therapy
sessions that focus on gross motor skills, as well as fine motor skills for
those with dysgraphia.
“It is amazing to me to see how really smart kids with
terrible handwriting get crushed by school,” says Marco. “On a short-answer
test you may know volumes but fail because writing a single sentence is
torture.”
Programs that work on cognitive control or attention are
also critical for SPD kids who have ADHD in addition. Marco has partnered on
this front with Joaquin Anguera, PhD, director of the clinical program at
Neuroscape, UCSF’s translational neuroscience center. They are addressing
cognitive control deficiencies with a new video gaming platform called Project
EVO (developed by Akili Interactive Labs, a UCSF startup). On EVO, kids
navigate a character along a winding path, avoiding obstacles and responding to
variously colored targets. It’s designed to strengthen the brain’s ability to
process and prioritize thoughts and external stimuli, and the game gets harder
as a player gets better at it. “Playing EVO actually made a difference in
issues of inattention that we measured in the lab and that were reported by
parents,” says Anguera, who is also an assistant professor of neurology and
psychiatry. “We showed a significant change in the kids’ neural activity. These
changes were really deep, and they persisted for nine months beyond the
eight-week intervention.”
Though medication is the therapy of last resort, it can be
crucial. Marco prescribes beta blockers, which dampen kids’ reactivity,
particularly to touch. It’s been a game-changer for Xander. “It has really
helped,” he says. “I don’t feel nearly as much pain if someone hugs me. But
I’ll still never be a huggy person.” Judy is thrilled. “I remember Xander
saying when he was little, ‘I wish I could get a jacket, like a bubble jacket,
because then I could just walk around and people could hug or brush up against
me and it wouldn’t hurt.’ Well, with this drug, he’s finally found that layer
of protection.”
Anguera and Marco are currently doing a feasibility study of
Neuroscape’s Body-Brain Trainer (BBT), a video game for kids with ADHD, some of
whom also have SPD. To play BBT, kids are hooked up to a heart monitor and put
in front of a large-screen TV. They’re then directed to touch an image that
flashes onto the screen. “We designed BBT to see if cognitive and physical
training lead to synergistic effects on cognition, so that one plus one equals
seven with respect to cognitive control abilities,” explains Anguera. They hope
this will be the case for kids with SPD who struggle with attention issues.
Marco is also poised to publish a study with Elliott Sherr,
MD, PhD, a fellow pediatric neurologist and resident alumnus. This study looked
at whether the genes involved in SPD are the same as or different from those
involved in autism; neurogeneticists have uncovered 76 genes that contribute to
autism. Marco and Sherr found that kids in Marco’s clinic have an enhanced
number of changes in these genes. “And so do their parents,” adds Marco, who
was initially uncomfortable sharing that finding with the parents. But it
turned out that few were surprised, given their own life experiences or
observations of their spouses’. “We’ve also found that 18 percent of our kids
have an identifiable genetic difference that is distinct from autism,” she
says.
https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2018/06/410786/living-with-sensory-processing-disorder
Elias, Xander, and Cal all experience extreme reactivity to tactile, auditory, or visual stimulation – a condition known as sensory processing disorder (SPD). Tactile triggers that torment kids with SPD include tags in shirts, wooly sweaters, socks, or an accidental shoulder brush during preschool circle time. Auditory offenses include coffee grinders, the birthday song – surprise or not – and noisy, erratically moving toys. Visual provocations that can set kids off include IMAX movies, crowded stadiums, parking lots, even bikes and tents hanging from the ceiling of a camping store. Whether seen, heard, or felt, what all these sensory inputs have in common is their sudden onset and unpredictability.
ReplyDeleteFor an SPD kid, these experiences are beyond a nails-on-a-chalkboard annoyance. “As soon as these kids can move themselves, they will run screaming from the room when these stimuli reach their world,” says Elysa Marco, MD ’00, a cognitive and behavioral pediatric neurologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital San Francisco and a member of the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences. Take Xander, who is now 14. He would rather be kicked in his hapkido martial arts class than receive a friendly hug. “It physically hurts when people hug me,” he says. This makes his mom, Judy, who is a hugger, think twice before reflexively going in for a hug. And Elias, at age 2, would hold his breath and sit at the bottom of the pool – the silence and water pressure his only solace.
Living in a state of perpetual flight, fight, or freeze in reaction to stimuli – or in constant fear of those reactions’ onset – takes a toll on SPD children and their parents alike. The disorder can be profoundly disruptive on every level. As a parent, how do you diaper a child who feels abraded by even a cloth diaper? And if you can’t diaper a child, how do you leave the house, much less go to work? As a preschool teacher, how do you manage a student who falls apart every time a block falls or a tambourine is tapped? And as that student, how do you connect with your classmates when you feel compelled to dart under a table to save yourself from that tumbling block or terrifying tambourine?
But as life-altering as SPD is for the children and families affected by it, the disorder isn’t included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), clinicians’ touchstone for diagnosing psychiatric conditions. Marco’s professional quest is to build a better understanding of the genetics and the neural underpinnings of sensory-processing differences. It’s clear that sensory overresponsivity is shared by many children with genetic or psychological conditions like autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Indeed, kids with SPD often struggle with more than hypersensitivity: Some 40 percent of kids with an SPD diagnosis also have dysgraphia, meaning they have such poor fine-motor coordination that they have difficulty writing, and 40 percent also have ADHD (these are not necessarily the same 40 percent). While Marco isn’t hung up on labels, she is committed to achieving better understanding and better therapeutic support for children with sensory-based challenges. She’s encouraged by signs that the field is moving past the DSM debate to a more genetic and symptom-based approach to caring for such kids – in their homes, schools, and communities.
According to Marco, who is also an associate professor of neurology at UCSF and a resident alumna, many SPD kids acquire an autism label along the way, which helps with insurance coverage. And there is overlap in the disorders. Nearly 90 percent of kids with autism also have sensory processing differences – some underresponsivity and some overresponsivity. However, kids with SPD do not usually exhibit the fixated interests, repetitive motions, and social indifference that are hallmarks of autism. “Kids with SPD are wanting to socially engage, they just can’t tolerate it,” explains Marco.
https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2018/06/410786/living-with-sensory-processing-disorder
Owen JP, Marco EJ, Desai S, Fourie E, Harris J, Hill SS, Arnett AB, Mukherjee P. Abnormal white matter microstructure in children with sensory processing disorders. Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Jun 23;2:844-53.
ReplyDeleteAbstract
Sensory processing disorders (SPD) affect 5-16% of school-aged children and can cause long-term deficits in intellectual and social development. Current theories of SPD implicate primary sensory cortical areas and higher-order multisensory integration (MSI) cortical regions. We investigate the role of white matter microstructural abnormalities in SPD using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). DTI was acquired in 16 boys, 8-11 years old, with SPD and 24 age-, gender-, handedness- and IQ-matched neurotypical controls. Behavior was characterized using a parent report sensory behavior measure, the Sensory Profile. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD) and radial diffusivity (RD) were calculated. Tract-based spatial statistics were used to detect significant group differences in white matter integrity and to determine if microstructural parameters were significantly correlated with behavioral measures. Significant decreases in FA and increases in MD and RD were found in the SPD cohort compared to controls, primarily involving posterior white matter including the posterior corpus callosum, posterior corona radiata and posterior thalamic radiations. Strong positive correlations were observed between FA of these posterior tracts and auditory, multisensory, and inattention scores (r = 0.51-0.78; p < 0.001) with strong negative correlations between RD and multisensory and inattention scores (r = - 0.61-0.71; p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate reduced white matter microstructural integrity in children with SPD. We find that the disrupted white matter microstructure predominantly involves posterior cerebral tracts and correlates strongly with atypical unimodal and multisensory integration behavior. These findings suggest abnormal white matter as a biological basis for SPD and may also distinguish SPD from overlapping clinical conditions such as autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.