Inspired by sibling (identical twin) patients
Yoo Y, Jung J, Lee YN, Lee Y, Cho H, Na E, Hong J, Kim E,
Lee JS, Lee JS, Hong C, Park SY, Wie J, Miller K, Shur N, Clow C, Ebel RS,
DeBrosse SD, Henderson LB, Willaert R, Castaldi C, Tikhonova I, Bilgüvar K, Mane S, Kim
KJ, Hwang YS, Lee SG, So I, Lim BC, Choi HJ, Seong JY, Shin YB, Jung H, Chae
JH, Choi M. GABBR2 mutations determine phenotype in rett syndrome and epileptic
encephalopathy. Ann Neurol. 2017 Sep;82(3):466-478.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Rett syndrome (RTT) and epileptic encephalopathy (EE) are
devastating neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct diagnostic criteria.
However, highly heterogeneous and overlapping clinical features often allocate
patients into the boundary of the two conditions, complicating accurate
diagnosis and appropriate medical interventions. Therefore, we investigated the
specific molecular mechanism that allows an understanding of the pathogenesis
and relationship of these two conditions.
METHODS:
We screened novel genetic factors from 34 RTT-like patients
without MECP2 mutations, which account for ∼90% of RTT cases, by whole-exome
sequencing. The biological function of the discovered variants was assessed in
cell culture and Xenopus tropicalis models.
RESULTS:
We identified a recurring de novo variant in GABAB receptor
R2 (GABBR2) that reduces the receptor function, whereas different GABBR2
variants in EE patients possess a more profound effect in reducing receptor
activity and are more responsive to agonist rescue in an animal model.
INTERPRETATION:
GABBR2 is a genetic factor that determines RTT- or EE-like
phenotype expression depending on the variant positions. GABBR2-mediated γ-aminobutyric
acid signaling is a crucial factor in determining the severity and nature of
neurodevelopmental phenotypes.
Vuillaume ML, Jeanne M, Xue L, Blesson S, Denommé-Pichon AS,
Alirol S, Brulard C, Colin E, Isidor B, Gilbert-Dussardier B, Odent S, Parent
P, Donnart A, Redon R, Bézieau S, Rondard P, Laumonnier F, Toutain A. A novel
mutation in the transmembrane 6 domain of GABBR2 leads to a Rett-like
phenotype. Ann Neurol. 2018 Feb;83(2):437-439.
We present a novel de novo heterozygous GABBR2 mutation,
A707T, identified by whole exome sequencing, also located in TM6 of GABBR2 but
associated with an RTT phenotype (Fig). The carrier, a 12‐year‐old girl, had
profound intellectual disability, hand stereotypies, and sleep and breathing
disturbances but no history of seizures. This mutation, predicted to be
pathogenic by in silico analyses, lies in a region crucial for
G‐protein–coupled receptor activation and positive allosteric modulation.5 To
assess its impact on GABA signaling activity, we coexpressed the 2 GABAB
subunits with the chimeric G‐protein Gαqi9 in HEK‐293 cells and measured the
accumulation of inositol phosphate (IP‐1) induced by the ligand GABA. We showed
that the signaling activity of our A707T mutant is weakly induced by the
agonist compared to that of the wild type, and this without altering GABBR2
cell surface expression. The same results were observed with the A567T and
I705N mutants. Moreover, the 4 mutants tested have a basal activity stronger
than that of the wild type, which might explain why the mutated receptor cannot
be stimulated efficiently by GABA. This basal activity is reversed by the
competitive antagonist CGP54626, except for the mutant S695I, which is already
fully active in the absence of GABA and does not respond to GABA in accordance
with the data of Yoo et al. To conclude, our results show that GABBR2 mutations
located within TM6 can also be associated with an RTT phenotype. The novel
mutation described here, A707T, also exerts a deleterious effect on GABAB
receptor activity. This deleterious effect could result from a constitutive
activity of the mutated GABAB receptor, highlighting a novel putative
pathogenic mechanism for GABBR2 variants.
Hamdan FF, Myers CT, Cossette P, Lemay P, Spiegelman D,
Laporte AD, Nassif C, Diallo O, Monlong J, Cadieux-Dion M, Dobrzeniecka S, Meloche
C, Retterer K, Cho MT, Rosenfeld JA, Bi W, Massicotte C, Miguet M, Brunga L, Regan
BM, Mo K, Tam C, Schneider A, Hollingsworth G; Deciphering Developmental
Disorders Study, FitzPatrick DR, Donaldson A, Canham N, Blair E, Kerr B, Fry
AE, Thomas RH, Shelagh J, Hurst JA, Brittain H, Blyth M, Lebel RR, Gerkes
EH, Davis-Keppen L, Stein Q, Chung WK, Dorison SJ, Benke PJ, Fassi E,
Corsten-Janssen N, Kamsteeg EJ,
Mau-Them FT, Bruel AL, Verloes A, Õunap K, Wojcik MH, Albert
DVF, Venkateswaran S, Ware T, Jones D, Liu YC, Mohammad SS, Bizargity P, Bacino
CA, Leuzzi V, Martinelli S, Dallapiccola B, Tartaglia M, Blumkin L,
Wierenga KJ, Purcarin G, O'Byrne JJ, Stockler S, Lehman A, Keren B, Nougues MC,
Mignot C, Auvin S, Nava C, Hiatt SM, Bebin M, Shao Y, Scaglia F, Lalani SR, Frye RE,
Jarjour IT, Jacques S, Boucher RM, Riou E, Srour M, Carmant L, Lortie A, Major P,
Diadori P, Dubeau F, D'Anjou G, Bourque G, Berkovic SF, Sadleir LG, Campeau PM,
Kibar Z, Lafrenière
RG, Girard SL, Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S, Boelman C, Rouleau GA,
Scheffer IE, Mefford HC, Andrade DM, Rossignol E, Minassian BA, Michaud JL. High
Rate of Recurrent De Novo Mutations in Developmental and Epileptic
Encephalopathies. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov 2;101(5):664-685.
Abstract
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) is a group
of conditions characterized by the co-occurrence of epilepsy and intellectual
disability (ID), typically with developmental plateauing or regression
associated with frequent epileptiform activity. The cause of DEE remains
unknown in the majority of cases. We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in
197 individuals with unexplained DEE and pharmaco-resistant seizures and in
their unaffected parents. We focused our attention on de novo mutations (DNMs)
and identified candidate genes containing such variants. We sought to identify
additional subjects with DNMs in these genes by performing targeted sequencing
in another series of individuals with DEE and by mining various sequencing
datasets. We also performed meta-analyses to document enrichment of DNMs in
candidate genes by leveraging our WGS dataset with those of several DEE and ID
series. By combining these strategies, we were able to provide a causal link
between DEE and the following genes: NTRK2, GABRB2, CLTC, DHDDS, NUS1, RAB11A,
GABBR2, and SNAP25. Overall, we established a molecular diagnosis in 63/197
(32%) individuals in our WGS series. The main cause of DEE in these individuals
was de novo point mutations (53/63 solved cases), followed by inherited
mutations (6/63 solved cases) and de novo CNVs (4/63 solved cases). De novo
missense variants explained a larger proportion of individuals in our series
than in other series that were primarily ascertained because of ID. Moreover,
these DNMs were more frequently recurrent than those identified in ID series.
These observations indicate that the genetic landscape of DEE might be
different from that of ID without epilepsy.
No comments:
Post a Comment