Sfeir JG, Kittah NEN, Tamhane SU, Jasim S, Chemaitilly W,
Cohen LE, Murad MH. Diagnosis of GH Deficiency as a Late Effect of Radiotherapy
in Survivors of Childhood Cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Aug
1;103(8):2785-2793.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Limited guidance exists for selecting a laboratory method
for diagnosing GH deficiency (GHD) when it occurs as a late effect of
radiotherapy in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs).
METHODS:
We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus for studies
evaluating GHD that used IGF-1 or IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) measurements
compared with GH dynamic testing.
RESULTS:
We included 15 studies [IGF-1 (8 studies) and IGFBP-3 (7
studies)] enrolling 477 patients. Comparator tests varied widely. Overall, both
IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 had suboptimal diagnostic accuracy but were strongly
correlated. The use of both tests simultaneously in the same cohort did not
improve the diagnostic accuracy. Despite high variability in the testing
protocols, dynamic tests remained the most accurate for appropriately
identifying patients with GHD. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) appears to be
the most accepted reference test when used alone or in combination with
arginine; however, standardized testing strategies among practice groups are
absent. GHRH and arginine stimulation performed almost similarly to the ITT;
however, in one study GHRH with arginine stimulation had 66% sensitivity and
88% specificity compared with the ITT. Insufficient data were available to
assess the accuracy of serial GH testing (nocturnal or over 24 hours).
CONCLUSION:
The diagnostic accuracy of various dynamic tests for GHD in
CCSs appears to follow the same patterns as those in non-CCSs. Interpreting
GHRH stimulation is a challenge given the primarily hypothalamic dysfunction in
CCSs. IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 perform poorly in this population.
_________________________________________________________________________-
Methods
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled
Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched for studies
evaluating GHD.
Studies using IGF-1 or IGFBP-3 measurements compared with GH
dynamic testing were identified.
Results
Fifteen studies (IGF-1 [8 studies] and IGFBP-3 [7 studies])
enrolling 477 patients were included.
Wide variation in comparator tests was noted.
Although strongly correlated, both IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 had
suboptimal diagnostic accuracy, and simultaneous use of both tests in the same
cohort did not improve the diagnostic accuracy.
For appropriately identifying patients with GHD, dynamic
tests remained the most accurate despite high variability in the testing
protocols.
Outcomes suggest the insulin tolerance test (ITT) to be the
most accepted reference test when used alone or in combination with arginine;
however, among practice groups, there were no standardized testing strategies.
GHRH and arginine stimulation were almost similar to ITT
regarding their performance; however, one study displayed 66% sensitivity and
88% specificity for GHRH with arginine stimulation compared with the ITT.
They identified no sufficient data assessing the accuracy of
serial GH testing (nocturnal or over 24 hours).
https://www.mdlinx.com/journal-summaries/pituitary-neuroendocrinology-radiotherapy/2018/08/09/7540729?spec=neurology
No comments:
Post a Comment