William E. Pelham Jr., Gregory A. Fabiano, James G.
Waxmonsky, Andrew R. Greiner, Elizabeth M. Gnagy, William E. Pelham III,
Stefany Coxe, Jessica Verley, Ira Bhatia, Katie Hart, Kathryn Karch, Evelien
Konijnendijk, Katy Tresco, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Susan A. Murphy. Treatment Sequencing for Childhood ADHD: A
Multiple-Randomization Study of Adaptive Medication and Behavioral
Interventions. Journal of Clinical Child
& Adolescent Psychology. Published
online: 16 Feb 2016.
Abstract
Behavioral and pharmacological treatments for children with
attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were evaluated to address
whether endpoint outcomes are better depending on which treatment is initiated
first and, in case of insufficient response to initial treatment, whether
increasing dose of initial treatment or adding the other treatment modality is
superior. Children with ADHD (ages 5–12, N = 146, 76% male) were treated for 1
school year. Children were randomized to initiate treatment with low doses of
either (a) behavioral parent training (8 group sessions) and brief teacher
consultation to establish a Daily Report Card or (b) extended-release
methylphenidate (equivalent to .15 mg/kg/dose bid). After 8 weeks or at later
monthly intervals as necessary, insufficient responders were rerandomized to
secondary interventions that either increased the dose/intensity of the initial
treatment or added the other treatment modality, with adaptive adjustments
monthly as needed to these secondary treatments. The group beginning with
behavioral treatment displayed significantly lower rates of observed classroom
rule violations (the primary outcome) at study endpoint and tended to have
fewer out-of-class disciplinary events. Further, adding medication secondary to
initial behavior modification resulted in better outcomes on the primary
outcomes and parent/teacher ratings of oppositional behavior than adding
behavior modification to initial medication. Normalization rates on teacher and
parent ratings were generally high. Parents who began treatment with behavioral
parent training had substantially better attendance than those assigned to
receive training following medication. Beginning treatment with behavioral
intervention produced better outcomes overall than beginning treatment with
medication.
Timothy F. Page, William E. Pelham III, Gregory A. Fabiano,
Andrew R. Greiner, Elizabeth M. Gnagy, Katie C. Hart, Stefany Coxe, James G.
Waxmonsky, E. Michael Foster & William E. Pelham Jr. . Comparative Cost Analysis of Sequential,
Adaptive, Behavioral, Pharmacological, and Combined Treatments for Childhood
ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child &
Adolescent Psychology. Published online:
16 Feb 2016.
Abstract
We conducted a cost analysis of the behavioral,
pharmacological, and combined interventions employed in a sequential, multiple
assignment, randomized, and adaptive trial investigating the sequencing and
enhancement of treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD; Pelham et al., 201X; N = 146, 76% male, 80% Caucasian). The
quantity of resources expended on each child’s treatment was determined from
records that listed the type, date, location, persons present, and duration of
all services provided. The inputs considered were the amount of physician time,
clinician time, paraprofessional time, teacher time, parent time, medication,
and gasoline. Quantities of these inputs were converted into costs in 2013 USD
using national wage estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the prices
of 30-day supplies of prescription drugs from the national Express Scripts
service, and mean fuel prices from the Energy Information Administration.
Beginning treatment with a low-dose/intensity regimen of behavior modification
(large-group parent training) was less costly for a school year of treatment
($961) than beginning treatment with a low dose of stimulant medication
($1,669), regardless of whether the initial treatment was intensified with a
higher “dose” or if the other modality was added. Outcome data from the parent
study (Pelham et al., 201X) found equivalent or superior outcomes for
treatments beginning with low-intensity behavior modification compared to
intervention beginning with medication. Combined with the present analyses,
these findings suggest that initiating treatment with behavior modification
rather than medication is the more cost-effective option for children with
ADHD.
Courtesy of: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/opinions/adhd-pills-for-children-drexler/?iid=ob_article_footer_expansion&iref=obinsite
No comments:
Post a Comment