Morgan LA, Buchhalter J. Psychogenic Paroxysmal Nonepileptic
Events in Children: A Review. Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Jul;53(1):13-22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Paroxysmal nonepileptic events are common in children.
Events with a psychological basis, historically referred to as pseudoseizures,
are a large subset of paroxysmal nonepileptic events.
METHODS:
A review of the relevant pediatric and adult literature was
performed.
RESULTS:
It was found that these events have many semioloigc features
similar to epileptic events and can be challenging to correctly identify. The
use of a detailed history in combination with video encephalography and
knowledge of psychogenic paroxysmal nonepileptic events will facilitate making
the correct diagnosis. Paroxysmal nonepileptic events are important to identify
as comorbid disorders such as depression, anxiety disorder, family discord, and
school issues are frequent. In addition, prior sexual, emotional, and/or
physical abuse may be present.
CONCLUSIONS:
Pediatric patients with paroxysmal nonepileptic events need
to be recognized in order to avoid unnecessary antiepileptic drugs and
emergency department or hospital visits and to facilitate appropriate
psychological intervention to address the underlying etiologies. This review
will focus on evaluation and identification of paroxysmal nonepileptic events,
in addition to reviewing the various comorbidities, effective treatments, and
outcomes for pediatric patients. The key differences between pediatric and
adult patients with paroxysmal nonepileptic events are addressed.
_______________________________________________________________________
From the article
In the pediatric population, 76.8%-80% of PNEs have an
abrupt start, and 68% end abruptly. Eye
closure during the entire attack occurs in 22%-45% and tremor in 25% in upper
instead of lower extremities. Furthermore,
the episodes can be classified as only unresponsiveness, unresponsiveness with
subtle motor activity, or unresponsive episodes of motor activity not typical
of known types of epileptic seizures such as generalized limb jerking,
thrashing of bodies and extremities, swooning, and generalized arrhythmic
flailing of extremities. In one
pediatric series in which “nonresponsive” was specifically mentioned, the event
was associated with generalized violent, thrashing, and uncoordinated movements
in 44%, generalized trembling in 26%, and only nonresponsiveness in 9%. Swoon type can be misdiagnosed as a vasovagal
event, but swoon type events prolonged over a minute should raise suspicion for
PNEs.
Several studies note that older children and adolescents
have more motor manifestations, whereas younger school-age children more
frequently exhibit staring. When motor
manifestations are present, they most commonly mimic generalized tonic-clonic
movements (60%), followed by focal clonic like movements (10%), and akinetic
(10%). There are conflicting data as to
whether children more typically demonstrate a single PNE semiology or multiple
semiologies. To best group the various
semiologies, a proposal of five major categories was created, allowing the
entire study cohort to be classified. These include: (I) abnormal motor
comprising (IA) hypermotor, (IB) partial motor, (II) affective/emotional
behavior phenomena, (III) dialeptic, (IV) “aura,” and (V) mixed pattern.
Correctly distinguishing PNEs from epileptic seizures
remains a diagnostic challenge, more so because up to 78% of PNEs in pediatric
patients are stereotypic and repetitive in nature. One study demonstrated a sedentary, dialeptic
form of events more frequently in younger children (less than 14 years) than
adults (29% versus 11%). Adults
typically retain awareness, even during generalized convulsions and have no discrete gaps of missing
memory. Both pediatric and adult
patients are usually at their baseline level of responsiveness immediately
following the event without displaying postictal confusion or sleepiness.
Emotional manifestations are more common in adults than in
children and may include combativeness, crying, yelling, and vulgar
language. In adult patients, weeping is
relatively common and strongly suggestive of PNEs. Pelvic thrusting is uncommon in children,
unlike in adults, although it has been documented at a frequency of 8.9% in children. Ictal
eye closure, convulsions longer than 2 minutes, postictal speech change, and
vocalizations during the tonic-clonic phase all occur significantly more in
adults than children. Ictal eye closure can still be noted at any
age and is more common in PNEs compared with epileptic seizures. Pupillary dilation is thought to be more
specific to epileptic seizures, yet dilation of pupils may occur from increased
sympathetic discharge from a stress response and thus may be seen with PNEs. Some historically classic signs for PNEs, such
as opisthotonos, postictal whispering, and biting the tip of the tongue, appear
to be rare in both children and adults.
PNEs vary in length, lasting from 30 seconds to upwards of
10 minutes, with events typically longer than 3 minutes, whereas epileptic seizures have a duration of
less than 3 minutes. One pediatric study
documented the mean duration of PNEs to be 269 ± 549 seconds (4 minutes, 29
seconds ± 9 minutes, 9 seconds) compared with epileptic seizure duration of
83.2 ± 222.4 seconds (1 minute, 32.2 seconds ± 3 minutes, 42.4 seconds). In a
separate study of 10 children presenting to the emergency department, PNEs were
documented with a broad range including 1 minute in three patients and 20-180
minutes in seven patients. Another
pediatric study reported PNE durations of 10-35 minutes; and those events
characterized by unresponsiveness have been reported to last as long as 40
minutes.
When PNEs were first described, it was thought that patients
would not suffer injurious behavior or have incontinence. Many adult and
pediatric studies to date have refuted this early belief, reporting injuries
such as tongue biting, patients injuring themselves against the bed guard
rails, bruises, fractures, clawing at the face, intubation, not responding to
painful stimuli, and urinary incontinence and defecation. In adult patients, caregiver reporting and
self-reporting of injuries is as high as 30.8% and includes tongue biting,
lacerations, limb fractures, and dental injury. In patients with injury, the frequency of
violent shaking movements, nocturnal PNEs, and urinary incontinence is
higher. 46 In addition, injury is more common during
PNEs in patients who have attempted suicide previously (61% versus 30%) 8 and
those with a history of physical abuse. In
adults, urinary or fecal incontinence, or both, may occur up to 20% of the
time. Overall, injury is not a common
feature in children. 34 36 In a study of 10 children seen in the
emergency department with PNE, none had incontinence and none were injured, but
nine had invasive procedures performed or laboratory tests obtained by the
emergency department or paramedics.
Takasaki K, Diaz Stransky A, Miller G. Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: Diagnosis, Management, and Bioethics. Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Sep;62:3-8.
ReplyDeleteAbstract
BACKGROUND:
The diagnosis and management of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is often challenging and fraught with discord and disagreement between patients, parents, and physicians. Furthermore, there are ethical challenges when making the diagnosis, communicating this information, and instituting management.
METHODS:
We reviewed the current body of knowledge regarding the characteristic differences between epileptic seizures and PNES, and the high incidence of psychiatric comorbidities. An ethical analysis was made of diagnosis and management based on ethical principles, virtue ethics, and the social contract that health professionals have with patients.
RESULTS:
Key distinctions between PNES and epilepsy lie in both patient and seizure characteristics. Long duration, eye closure, asynchronous movements, frequent recurrence in the same context, intra-ictal awareness, and lack of post ictal state are useful in helping establish the diagnosis. Psychiatric comorbidities, history of abuse, cognitive impairment, and multiple non specific somatic complaints are some salient patient features that should increase suspicion for the diagnosis of PNES. However, definitive diagnosis rests on capturing the events on video EEG.
CONCLUSION:
Effective diagnosis and management of PNES requires the use of video EEG and an early collaborative approach between pediatricians, neurologists, psychiatrists, nursing staff, and other professional colleagues. Ethical questions that may arise should be addressed with the virtues of competence, courage, compassion, prudence, and honesty; and the principles of respect beneficence, and the avoidance of unnecessary harm.