Jun JS, Lee ST, Kim R, Chu K, Lee SK. Tocilizumab treatment
for new onset refractory status epilepticus. Ann Neurol. 2018
Dec;84(6):940-945.
Abstract
We investigated the therapeutic potential of the
interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab in 7 patients with new onset
refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) who remained refractory to conventional
immunotherapy with rituximab (n = 5) or without rituximab (n = 2). Status
epilepticus (SE) was terminated after 1 or 2 doses of tocilizumab in 6 patients
with a median interval of 3 days from the initiation. They had no recurrence of
SE during the observation. However, 2 patients experienced severe adverse
events related to infection during the tocilizumab therapy. Further prospective
controlled studies are warranted to validate the efficacy and safety of
tocilizumab in patients with NORSE.
_____________________________________________________________________
Seizures were aborted in six of seven patients with
new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) within three days after
treatment with the interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab (Actemra),
according to a new case series report published online November 8 in Annals of
Neurology. All seven NORSE patients had been unresponsive to conventional
immunotherapy therapies and rituximab.
NORSE is a rare condition characterized by new onset of
refractory status epilepticus in a patient without epilepsy or another relevant
preexisting neurologic disorder, without a clear acute or active structural,
toxic, or metabolic cause.
“These are patients without any preexisting history of
epilepsy who [suddenly] go into status epilepticus,” said Jeffrey W. Britton,
MD, FAAN, professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, who was
not involved with the study. “The mortality and morbidity of refractory status
epilepticus is very high, and for survivors the functional consequences can be
significant.”
Between 20- and 30-percent of patients with NORSE do not
survive, and most survivors have lifelong epilepsy as well as significant
neurological sequelae, according to a study published earlier this year in
Epilepsia…
In the current study, three of the patients (43 percent) had
good or fair functional outcomes, defined as a having score greater than 3 on
the modified Rankin Scale at discharge and the use of antiepileptic drugs at
the last follow-up.
The study, led by Jin-Sun Jun, MD, professor of neurology at
the Kyungpook National University School of Medicine and colleagues at Seoul
National University Hospital in South Korea, found that some of those on
tocilizumab had severe adverse events, however. Two patients experienced
adverse events of grade 3 or higher: A 22-year-old man had pneumonia and a
19-year-old woman died after experiencing a worsening of preexisting sepsis.
Other adverse events included leukopenia (grade 2, n=3) and diarrhea (grade 2,
n=1).
The authors acknowledged some significant limitations to the
study, including heterogeneity in both the patients' pretreatment histories and
the tocilizumab regimens they were given, which could limit the ability to
generalize based on their results.
The authors also noted that while three of the seven
patients had good or fair outcomes after discharge, those outcomes were not
better than those reported in a previous large case series reported in
Neurology in 2015…
Commenting on the study findings, Dr. Britton of the Mayo
Clinic pointed out that four of the seven patients in the case series had
significant elevations of interleukin-6, the target of tocilizumab, which
provides some potential mechanistic evidence as to why this particular drug may
have worked. He cited his own center's recent experience with a pediatric FIRES
patient refractory to standard treatment, whose analysis of cerebrospinal fluid
interleukin levels suggested a potential response to the IL-1 antagonist
anakinra (Kineret), a rheumatoid arthritis medication. “She responded well and
made an excellent recovery,” Dr. Britton said….
But the experts cautioned that this study should not
necessarily be used as justification for wide-scale use of tocilizumab in NORSE
cases. “You're in such dire straits with these patients [that] I think the
temptation, based on this article, is going to be to use this earlier, and in a
more indiscriminate manner,” said Dr. Britton. “These inflammatory markers are
not widely available, and not every lab is going to be able to do them for the
clinician at the bedside.”…
There was a hint in this study that those who got
tocilizumab earlier in the course of their illness responded better than those
who got it later. You don't want to wait several weeks before initiating
immunotherapy, as it looks like doing so earlier is much more effective, based
on this series and others.”
Dr. Schmitt advised caution, however, pointing to the
severity of the adverse events in the case series. “As a rule, people with
NORSE don't die from epilepsy per se; they die from complications related to
their long stays in the intensive care unit, such as venous thromboembolism and
respiratory complications. If these medications potentially worsen the risk of
these infections, we might be treating their status epilepticus effectively but
at the same time making them more susceptible to blood-borne pathogens and
other types of illness. So I would be extremely cautious, given those results,
about treating a patient with those medications if they were known to have any
type of ongoing infection.”
Five of the seven patients had been treated with IVIg,
steroids, and rituximab, while the other two had been treated with IVIg plus
steroids. “Additive immune suppression really increases a patient's chance of
developing dangerous opportunistic infections,” Dr. Schmitt said. “When do you
try it? That's the challenge. Although patients who got this this medication
earlier appeared to do better, I would be a little nervous about the
significant risks of adverse events. I would say this medication might be a
third-line alternative to cyclophosphamide, which some people have been using
as a third-line option and which is also associated with a significant risk of
immunosuppression complications. There is relative equipoise between those two
drugs, but I would not use this agent before methylprednisolone or IVIg.”
https://journals.lww.com/neurotodayonline/Fulltext/2019/01100/In_Small_Case_Series,_Tocilizumab_Shows_Promise.2.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment