Levetiracetam (Keppra) is favored by clinicians over sodium
channel blockers as the first prescribed treatment for their patients, but it
is also more frequently discontinued due to mood-altering adverse events,
researchers reported here at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy
Society.
Through the Human Epilepsy Project, the researchers were
able to pull data on 405 newly-diagnosed patients with epilepsy who had been
initiated on monotherapy and had two years or more data since they started
their antiepileptic drug. They found that 232 clinicians started
their patients on levetiracetam—more than three times
greater frequency than the next drug of choice, lamotrigine, which was
prescribed to 72 patients, reported Jacqueline A. French, MD, FAAN, professor
of neurology at NYU Langone Health.
But after two years, just 86 patients, or 37.1 percent, who
had been prescribed levetiracetam as monotherapy were still on that regimen;
14.2 percent of patients who started on levetiracetam had added another
medication to their regimen, and 48.1 percent of the patients had switched from
levetiracetam to another agent, Dr. French said at her poster presentation.
"Overwhelmingly they chose levetiracetam as the first
drug for treatment, and we think that is because it is an easy drug to prescribe.
It doesn't require titration, and theoretically it is well-tolerated," she
said. "However, when we followed the treatment of these patients, the drug
that was chosen most often was discontinued at twice the rate of the older
sodium channel blockers.
"So, we are asking the question: Is it really the drug
that should be started first?" Dr. French said. "There are people in
the community who are now being told that when you have a patient with
epilepsy, the only thing you have to know is to prescribe levetiracetam This
study appears to show that such advice may not be true."
Patients said they discontinued levetiracetam mainly because
of mood alterations—36.3 percent of patients on the drug said they dropped it
due to mood changes such as depression and 36.3 percent cited irritability and
aggression as reasons for discontinuing the drug. Dr. French also noted that
31.4 percent of the patients originally assigned to levetiracetam discontinued
it due to lack of seizure control.
On the other hand, she said, patients who were on sodium
channel blockers tended to stay on those treatments: 70.8 percent of patients
taking lamotrigine remained on the drug, for example.
Commenting on the data, one neurologist said that he would
still offer levetiracetam to his patients as a first choice. "This information does not necessarily
change my practice, which is to prescribe levetiracetam first to these
patients," said Aaron Geller, MD, a neurologist with the Northeast
Regional Epilepsy Group of Morristown, NJ, as well as Hackensack University
Medical Center and Overlook Medical Center. "I think levetiracetam is a
sufficiently benign medication, and it is worth prescribing it to patients and
see if they can tolerate it. I would want them to tell me that they felt bad on
it before I would want to try another treatment."
He pointed out that all the treatments have side effects.
"There are strikes against all of them so I would wait to see if there was
a problem with levetiracetam before considering a second drug in this population,"
Dr. Geller said. "Having to switch a medication is not the end of the
world."
But Shaun O. Smart, MD, assistant professor of neurology at
Memorial-Hermann Texas Medical Center of UTHealth in Houston, had a different
perspective. "We have seen a lot of problems with our patients who have
been on levetiracetam due to these mood changes. It can be a serious
problem."
Angela Parsons, MD, a senior epilepsy fellow at the Mayo
Clinic in Scottsdale, AZ, reported outcomes similar to those in the current
study here at the AES annual meeting. "We think that you should discuss
with patients if they have mood problems at the time of prescribing
levetiracetam, and avoid the drug if there is a problem at baseline. We found
that even mild behavioral complications from levetiracetam can impact quality
of life."
"In patients at risk of mood problems, the transition
from levetiracetam to another antiepileptic drug with a lower incidence of
adverse mood effects should be considered," Dr. Parsons said. In her clinic,
patients were transitioned to lamotrigine.
In Dr. French's study, none of the patients who were
originally treated with lamotrigine expressed any of these mood disturbances as
a reason for discontinuation.
The Human Epilepsy Project study is supported by the
Epilepsy Study Consortium, a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating
the development of new therapies in epilepsy to improve patient care. The
funding provided to the consortium comes from industry, philanthropy, and
foundations: UCB Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Lundbeck, Sunovion, The Andrews
Foundation, The Vogelstein Foundation, Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures
[FACES], and Friends of Faces.
Drs. Geller, Smart, and Parsons disclosed no relevant
relationships with industry.
https://journals.lww.com/neurotodayonline/blog/NeurologyTodayConferenceReportersAESAnnualMeeting/pages/post.aspx?PostID=55&cid=2019-Ann-Conference.32-SEND-Dec11US&rid=&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTldFd09UZGpNVFV4TVRkayIsInQiOiIrZVlOeTNoMkZ6QVRqcElzSnpPc01ORkd2KzBHb0RyK1NSOGx0R3BhWVwvT3daY29kc003T015Q3JpMEFqRXFxXC9obmRMaUI1MGRwSUNTcUhoaHBhWEpZcWtXYnIrOGVCK3BDVHFBMXhwTkRXYlwvall2aE9SYjEzMzBJMUxFRUIxZiJ9
LEVETIRACETAM VERSUS SODIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS AS FIRST
PRESCRIBED ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG: DATA FROM THE HUMAN EPILEPSY PROJECT
Authors: Lydia Cassard, New York University; Manu Hegde,
University of California, San Francisco; Barry E. Gidal, University of Wisconsin,
Madison; Tracy Glauser, Cincinnati Children's Hospital; R. Edward Faught, Emory
University; David M. Ficker, University of Cincinnati; Scott Mintzer, Thomas
Jefferson University; Bassel Abou-Khalil, Vanderbilt University; Brian
Alldredge, University of California, San Francisco; Pavel Klein, Mid-Atlantic
Epilepsy and Sleep Center; Sarah N. Barnard, Monash University; Jon Shadan, New
York University; Jacqueline A. French, New York University
Content:
RATIONALE:
We wished to assess current prescribing practices in newly
diagnosed focal epilepsy. The Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) is a prospective,
observational study whose goal is to identify markers of treatment response in
newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. We assessed the AED exposures over the first 2
years of treatment.
METHODS:
Subjects were recruited from 33 sites in the US, Australia,
Austria, and Finland. Inclusion criteria included: focal epilepsy, within 4
months of initial diagnosis, and all data related to AED therapy initiation
available. 450 subjects have been enrolled. We selected those initiated on
monotherapy and with two years or more data since AED start (N=403). We also excluded subjects who did not have
medical records available (10), did not have a known treatment start date (65),
or had missing data (64), leaving 264 for analysis. We assessed only the AEDs
used in the first 2 years.
RESULTS:
157 (59.5%) initiated levetiracetam (LEV), 49 (18.6%)
lamotrigine (LTG), 21 (8%) oxcarbazepine (OXC), 11 (4.2%) phenytoin, 5 (1.9%)
topiramate, 12 (4.5%) carbamazepine, (CBZ)
2 (0.8%) lacosamide, 5 (1.9%) valproic acid, 1 (0.4%) pregabalin, and 1
(0.4%) zonisamide.Of the 157 started on LEV, 63 (31.6%) remained on the drug in
monotherapy, 76 (48%) switched to another AED, 12 (7.6%) added an AED in conjunction,
and 6 (3.8%) ceased AED usage. Of the 49 started on LTG, 34 (69.4%) remained on the drug in
monotherapy, 10 (20%) switched to
another AED, 4 (8.2%) added an AED in conjunction, and 1 (2%) ceased AED usage.
Of the 21 started on OXC, 11 (52.4%) remained on the drug in monotherapy,
9(43%) switched to another AED, 1 (4.8%) added an AED in conjunction. Of the 12
started on CBZ, 6 (50%) remained on the drug for at least 2 years, 3 (25%)
switched AEDs, and 3 (25%) ceased usage. Combining the sodium channel blockers
LTG, OXC, and CBZ, (PHT excluded since often d/c’d after start in the ER) 51/82
(62%) of patients remained on initial monotherapy. By the end of the study, pts
were receiving the following AEDs alone or in combination: LEV 36.0%, LTG 37.5%,
CBZ 6.8%, OXC 17.0%, PHT 0.8%, topiramate 2.3%, lacosamide 7.2%, valproic acid
1.9%, zonisamide 4.9%, lorazepam 0.8%, clobazam 0.4%, clonazepam 0.4%. 79.9% of
patients were on monotherapy, 16.7% on polytherapy, and 2.7% discontinued AED
usage.
CONCLUSIONS:
LEV is by far the most commonly initiated AED for focal
epilepsy (3 X more than any other single AED). The likelihood of remaining on
initial monotherapy was twice as high for a sodium channel blocker as for LEV
in the first 2 years of treatment. (P=.001)
FUNDING:
The HEP study is supported by the Epilepsy Study Consortium
(ESCI), a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating the development of
new therapies in epilepsy to improve patient care. The funding provided to ESCI
to support HEP comes from industry, philanthropy, and foundations (UCB Pharma,
Eisai, Pfizer, Lundbeck, Sunovion, The Andrews Foundation, The Vogelstein
Foundation, Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures [FACES], Friends of Faces
and others).
No comments:
Post a Comment