Goeggel Simonetti B, Rafay MF, Chung M, Lo WD, Beslow LA,
Billinghurst LL, Fox CK, Pagnamenta A, Steinlin M, Mackay MT; IPSS Study Group.
Comparative study of posterior and anterior circulation stroke in childhood:
Results from the International Pediatric Stroke Study. Neurology. 2020 Jan
28;94(4):e337-e344. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008837. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes
after posterior circulation arterial ischemic stroke (PCAIS) and anterior
circulation arterial ischemic stroke (ACAIS) in neonates and children.
METHODS:
In this international multicenter observational study
including neonates and children up to 18 years of age with arterial ischemic
stroke (AIS), we compared clinical and radiologic features according to stroke
location.
RESULTS:
Of 2,768 AIS cases, 507 (18%) were located in the posterior
circulation, 1,931 (70%) in the anterior circulation, and 330 (12%) involved
both. PCAIS was less frequent in neonates compared to children (8.8% vs 22%, p
< 0.001). Children with PCAIS were older than children with ACAIS (median
age 7.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.1-14] vs 5.1 [IQR 1.5-12] years, p <
0.001), and more often presented with headache (54% vs 32%, p < 0.001) and a
lower Pediatric NIH Stroke Scale score (4 [IQR 2-8] vs 8 [IQR 3-13], p =
0.001). Cervicocephalic artery dissections (CCAD) were more frequent (20% vs
8.5%, p < 0.001), while cardioembolic strokes were less frequent (19% vs
32%, p < 0.001) in PCAIS. Case fatality rates were equal in both groups (2.9%).
PCAIS survivors had a better outcome (normal neurologic examination at hospital
discharge in 29% vs 21%, p = 0.002) than ACAIS survivors, although this trend
was only observed in children and not in neonates.
CONCLUSION:
PCAIS is less common than ACAIS in both neonates and
children. Children with PCAIS are older and have a higher rate of CCAD, lower
clinical stroke severity, and better outcome than children with ACAIS.
No comments:
Post a Comment