Thursday, July 18, 2024

Congenital myasthenic syndromes

Kediha MI, Tazir M, Sternberg D, Eymard B, Ali Pacha L. Innovative Therapeutic Approaches in Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes. Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;14(3):e200277. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200277. Epub 2024 May 7. PMID: 38737513; PMCID: PMC11081764.

Abstract

Background and objectives: To provide real-word clinical follow-up data on patients carrying variations of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and who respond to some innovative drugs.

Methods: Patients recruited from the Neurology Department of the Mustapha Bacha university hospital in Algiers. Treated with innovative drugs, they were monitored and their clinical progress was evaluated on the basis of clinical arguments suggestive of CMSs, but also para clinical arguments (electromyography and genetic study).

Results: Six patients carrying different mutations in different genes of CMSs were studied. They had different pathophysiologic profiles (slow or fast channel syndromes, low expressor of receptor). Their therapeutic management was based on innovative drugs, normally indicated in other, non-neurological pathologies. Their outcome was toward a clear clinical improvement.

Discussion: This work relates the interest of proposing treatments (outside of Pyridostigmine) in the management of CMSs. These therapies can greatly modify the prognosis of patients suffering from this orphan disease.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with congenital myasthenic syndromes, some innovative treatments are effective.

Kao JC, Milone M, Selcen D, Shen XM, Engel AG, Liewluck T. Congenital myasthenic syndromes in adult neurology clinic: A long road to diagnosis and therapy. Neurology. 2018 Nov 6;91(19):e1770-e1777. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006478. Epub 2018 Oct 5. PMID: 30291185; PMCID: PMC6251603.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic challenges of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) in adult neuromuscular practice.

Methods: We searched the Mayo Clinic database for patients with CMS diagnosed in adulthood in the neuromuscular clinic between 2000 and 2016. Clinical, laboratory, and electrodiagnostic data were reviewed.

Results: We identified 34 patients with CMS, 30 of whom had a molecular diagnosis (14 DOK7, 6 RAPSN, 2 LRP4, 2 COLQ, 2 slow-channel syndrome, 1 primary acetylcholine receptor deficiency, 1 AGRN, 1 GFPT1, and 1 SCN4A). Ophthalmoparesis was often mild and present in 13 patients. Predominant limb-girdle weakness occurred in 19 patients. Two patients had only ptosis. Age at onset ranged from birth to 39 years (median 5 years). The median time from onset to diagnosis was 26 years (range 4-56 years). Thirteen patients had affected family members. Fatigable weakness was present when examined. Creatine kinase was elevated in 4 of 23 patients (range 1.2-4.2 times the upper limit of normal). Repetitive nerve stimulation revealed a decrement in 30 patients. Thirty-two patients were previously misdiagnosed with seronegative myasthenia gravis (n = 16), muscle diseases (n = 15), weakness of undetermined cause (n = 8), and others (n = 4). Fifteen patients received immunotherapy or thymectomy without benefits. Fourteen of the 25 patients receiving pyridostigmine did not improve or worsen.

Conclusion: Misdiagnosis occurred in 94% of the adult patients with CMS and causes a median diagnostic delay of nearly 3 decades from symptom onset. Seronegative myasthenia gravis and muscle diseases were the 2 most common misdiagnoses, which led to treatment delay and unnecessary exposure to immunotherapy, thymectomy, or muscle biopsy.

No comments:

Post a Comment