Aylward SC, Reem RE. Pediatric Intracranial Hypertension.
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Jan;66:32-43.
Abstract
Primary (idiopathic) intracranial hypertension has been
considered to be a rare entity, but with no precise estimates of the pediatric
incidence in the United States. There have been attempts to revise the criteria
over the years and adapt the adult criteria for use in pediatrics. The clinical
presentation varies with age, and symptoms tending to be less obvious in
younger individuals. In the prepubertal population, incidentally discovered
optic disc edema is relatively common. By far the most consistent symptom is
headache; other symptoms include nausea, vomiting tinnitus, and diplopia.
Treatment mainstays include weight loss when appropriate and acetazolamide.
Furosemide may exhibit a synergistic benefit when used in conjunction with
acetazolamide. Surgical interventions are required relatively infrequently, but
include optic nerve sheath fenestration and cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pain
and permanent vision loss are the two major complications of this disorder and
these manifestations justify aggressive treatment. Once intracranial
hypertension has resolved, up to two thirds of patients develop a new or
chronic headache type that is different from their initial presenting headache.
_______________________________________________________________
Until very recently, there have been no concrete estimates
of pediatric intracranial hypertension in the United States. Unless physicians
are paying attention to the literature, they may not even be using the current
nomenclature for the condition, and use the older term “pseudotumor cerebri”
instead.
Shawn Aylward MD, member of the Division of Neurology at
Nationwide Children’s Hospital and director of the hospital’s Intracranial
Hypertension Clinic, has sought to both spotlight and more clearly define the
condition in a series of publications in the last year. While pediatric
intracranial hypertension may be rare, his clinic saw 173 unique patients in
2016, and he is well aware that physicians can miss it.
“When it is not frequently encountered, it is often
forgotten,” says Dr. Aylward, who is also an assistant professor of Clinical
Pediatrics at The Ohio State University College of Medicine. “The stereotypical
intracranial hypertension patient is postpubertal and overweight. Many
clinicians would consider the condition if that patient presented with
headaches or vision problems. But a slender, young child with headaches? Or an
asymptomatic child who is discovered to have optic disc edema during a routine
ophthalmic exam? Some clinicians may not think about it.”
Dr. Aylward was lead author of a recent invited review in
Pediatric Neurology detailing the incidence, evaluation, diagnosis and
treatment of pediatric intracranial hypertension – along with calling for the
use of the terms “primary intracranial hypertension” and “secondary
intracranial hypertension” (when a clear cause of increased cranial pressure
can be found). “Pseudotumor cerebri” and “idiopathic intracranial hypertension”
remain in wide use but can lead to confusion, says Dr. Aylward.
He was also the lead author of a 2016 publication in
Pediatric Neurology examining the presentations of intracranial hypertension in
a large pediatric cohort drawn from the Intracranial Hypertension Registry at
the Intracranial Hypertension Research Foundation. While likely a population
with more severe manifestations of the disease, the publication confirmed much
of what researchers had found in smaller studies:
Headache was a reported symptom in 96.5 percent of patients
with primary intracranial hypertension and 98.4 percent of those with secondary
intracranial hypertension
Bilateral optic nerve edema was found in 89.3 percent and
78.7 percent, respectively
Most practitioners consider postpubertal obese females to be
the classic intracranial hypertension patient, but only 21.2% of patients fit
this description
Prepubertal primary intracranial hypertension patients had a
female-to-male ratio of 1:1.04 (lower than that found in the literature) but
postpubertal patients had a ratio of 6:1 (higher than ratios reported
elsewhere)
Because of various findings about the prevalence of optic
nerve edema, a fundoscopic exam is essential in an initial evaluation for
intracranial hypertension.
“If clinicians are not comfortable with fundoscopy, they
should refer the patients to an ophthalmologist, ” says Dr. Aylward. “Our
clinic is a joint venture between Neurology and Ophthalmology at Nationwide
Children’s, and it is common that a patient comes to us over concerns for edema
found by an outside practitioner. It’s important that after such a finding, we
see a patient relatively quickly.”
Defining and treating pediatric intracranial hypertension is
important, and it’s been an obvious focus of the clinic at Nationwide
Children’s. With so many patients being followed, Dr. Aylward and his
colleagues believe they can now begin moving toward researching potential
causes.
“We have this all this data, from children who have been
evaluated, diagnosed and treated here,” he says. “We are now trying to figure
out why they have this condition at all.”
https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/medical-professional-publications/pediatric-intracranial-hypertension-a-forgotten-diagnosis? contentId=161947&orgId=5492&et_rid=279164201&et_cid=7406163&utm_medium=ET-Email&utm_content=http%253a%252f%252fwww.nationwidechildrens.org%252fmedical-professional-publications%252fpediatric-intracranial-hypertension-a-forgotten-diagnosis%253fcontentId%253d161947%2526orgId%253d5492&utm_campaign=PedsOnline_Specialty&utm_source=03-21-2018_03+-+PedsOnline+March+2018+-+Specialty
No comments:
Post a Comment