Jean-Pierre Lin, Nardo
Nardocci. Recognizing the Common Origins
of Dystonia and the Development of Human Movement: A Manifesto of Unmet Needs
in Isolated Childhood Dystonias. Front. Neurol., 19 December 2016 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00226
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2016.00226/full?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Neurology-w1-2017
A Need to Recognize That Many Different Patterns of Brain
Injury Can Cause Dystonia: Emphasizing Dystonia as a Manifestation of a
Disturbed Distributed Network
If we accept that dystonia emerges out of an initial
developmental cocontraction pattern of movements and postures and that motor
development arises from an ab initio hyperkinetic motor condition, it is not
difficult to understand why so many disorders with seemingly completely
different mechanisms result in dystonia.
Apart from the classical injuries of the developing brain, approximately 17–20% of children with CP have normal neuroimaging, which calls into question “where exactly is the non-progressive injury
to the developing brain” said to be the defining hallmark of CP? A feature all
the more intriguing when over 50% of children with “dyskinetic CP” have normal
brain imaging.
This suggests that the brain in early dystonic motor disorders
may fail to develop the efficient and functional connectivity networks
underpinning normal motor development. By extension of this hypothesis, the
child with early onset dystonia may be utilizing an under-pruned,
over-arborized network of connections (rather than a damaged network). This
calls into question therapeutic approaches centered on “curing” CP with stem
cell therapies, for instance see Graham for a recent discussion of the role of stem
cells in CP. However, it is conceivable that stem cells, not only repair
damaged areas of the brain but also facilitate activity-dependent plasticity,
which could be associated with promoting functional connectivity.
Connectivity within the brain of the child with dystonia, may be measured by whole white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) estimations using diffusion-weighted imaging methods with the technique of MRI Diffusion Tensor Imaging. This provides information about white matter microstructure integrity and is derived from the differential diffusion of water molecules along fiber tracts. The FA value from 0.0 to 1.0 represents the likelihood of water diffusing along fibers (FA maximum = 1.0) or water diffusing randomly in all directions because there are no fibers (FA minimum = 0.0). The FA value may therefore be a useful marker of the connectivity of the brain: higher FA values corresponding to greater structural connectivity and integrity of the white matter fiber tracts within the brain and vice versa. For instance, in a cohort of children selected on clinical, conventional radiological, and neurophysiological assessments preparatory to management of dystonia with DBS or ITB, the mean DBS-group FA value was >0.5, but the FA value was <0.5 in the ITB group. Such statistical imaging parameters may in the future, with neurophysiological parameters become a means of appropriately stratifying children with dystonia into prognostic groups suitable for intervention with DBS or ITB...
Connectivity within the brain of the child with dystonia, may be measured by whole white matter fractional anisotropy (FA) estimations using diffusion-weighted imaging methods with the technique of MRI Diffusion Tensor Imaging. This provides information about white matter microstructure integrity and is derived from the differential diffusion of water molecules along fiber tracts. The FA value from 0.0 to 1.0 represents the likelihood of water diffusing along fibers (FA maximum = 1.0) or water diffusing randomly in all directions because there are no fibers (FA minimum = 0.0). The FA value may therefore be a useful marker of the connectivity of the brain: higher FA values corresponding to greater structural connectivity and integrity of the white matter fiber tracts within the brain and vice versa. For instance, in a cohort of children selected on clinical, conventional radiological, and neurophysiological assessments preparatory to management of dystonia with DBS or ITB, the mean DBS-group FA value was >0.5, but the FA value was <0.5 in the ITB group. Such statistical imaging parameters may in the future, with neurophysiological parameters become a means of appropriately stratifying children with dystonia into prognostic groups suitable for intervention with DBS or ITB...
The Need to Recognize Non-Motor Symptoms in Childhood
Dystonia
The focus on the classic motor symptoms of dystonia, i.e.,
involuntary muscle contractions and abnormal postures has left a gap in
research on the non-motor aspects of the dystonic disorders such as
abnormalities in sensory and perceptual functions, neuropsychiatric
disturbances, and sleep. The comorbidity of non-motor symptoms is increasingly
recognized in adults with dystonia. It is not known, if these
non-motor symptoms, including poor sleep patterns, are intrinsic to
dystonia comorbidities or secondary to the dystonia disorders themselves.
Understanding the role of non-motor symptoms in childhood dystonia has
potential implications for clinical assessment tools; pre- and post-surgical
interventions, e.g., deep brain stimulation (DBS), and treatment targets.
Moreover, these non-motor symptoms play a vital role in determining quality of
life. Although research has begun to investigate these non-motor phenomena in
typically developing children and autistic children, no systematic evaluation of
non-motor symptoms exist for the childhood dystonia population…
Further work on the non-motor aspects of living with
dystonia is urgently required. These non-motor aspects of dystonia could relate
to abnormal sensory processing, body image, cognitive issues, and the social
context of physical dependency and lack of opportunity for independence…
Measuring What Matters Most to Children with Dystonia is
also an Unmet Need
Most studies fail to report what matters most to children
with dystonia and their carers: reduction in pain, improvements in activities
of daily living, and manual function. This is a particularly important failing
since dystonia worsens in approximately 2/3 of cases and remains severe in a
further 1/3 of cases referred for further management after conventional
medication…
Exploration of Better Pharmacological Approaches to Managing
Dystonia in Childhood as an Unmet Need
Although several medications are regularly used in the
first-line management of dystonia, the evidence to support pharmacological
agents in childhood dystonia is weak. Trihexyphenidyl has some evidence of
efficacy to support its use in adults with dystonia. In a retrospective cohort
of 278 children with dystonia referred to a single center from all over the
United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, medication use had been prospectively
gathered including adverse drug reactions (ADR).
The commonest drugs used were baclofen (118/278: 42.4%),
trihexyphenidyl (98/278: 35.2%), l-dopa (57/278: 20.5%), and diazepam (53/278:
19%). Choice of medication appeared to be influenced by dystonia etiology. ADR
had occurred in 171/278 (61.5%) of children: the commonest drugs responsible
for ADR being trihexyphenidyl (90/171: 52.3%), baclofen (43/171: 25.1%), and
l-dopa (26/171: 15.2%) (70). Unfortunately, pharmacological management of
dystonia in children is often disappointing or not tolerated. No medication is
licensed for the management of dystonia in childhood . This includes new conceptual
approaches to mechanisms of relieving dystonia. Gabapentin has been reported to
be beneficial in relieving dystonia in a relatively large open trial in
children with often severe dystonia, which was liable to disrupt night sleep,
impair the capacity to tolerate sitting comfortably, reduce activities of daily
living, disrupt mood and behavior, and very often associated with severe pain.
Outcomes were measured using the Dystonia Severity Assessment Plan (DSAP) and the activities of daily living were mapped
on a scale of 0–4 using the WHO International Classification of Function where
0 = no difficulty and 4 = maximum difficulty most of the time. Gabapentin may
thus become a new, “re-purposed” medication for routine management of dystonias
in childhood subject to further studies with a view to obtaining a license for
gabapentin liquid and tablets/capsules in childhood dystonia.
Liow NY, Gimeno H, Lumsden DE, Marianczak J, Kaminska M, Tomlin S, Lin JP. Gabapentin can significantly improve dystonia severity and quality of life in children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016 Jan;20(1):100-7.
ReplyDeleteAbstract
INTRODUCTION:
Gabapentin has been used in the management of neuropathic pain, epilepsy and occasionally movement disorders.
METHODS:
A four-year retrospective, observational study analysed the use of gabapentin for severe dystonia in children at the Evelina London Children's Hospital. Motor severity was classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Dystonia Severity Assessment Plan (DSAP) and levels of impairment in activities of daily living were graded according to the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Children & Youth version (ICF-CY) before and after gabapentin.
RESULTS:
The majority of the 69 children reported were level 5 GMFCS (non-ambulant). The DSAP grade fell significantly from grade 3 before to grade 1 after gabapentin. Significant improvements in median ICF-CY grades were seen following gabapentin in sleep quality, sleep amount, mood & agreeableness, pain, general muscle tone, involuntary muscle contractions and seating tolerance (p < 0.01 in all areas). A significantly higher mean dose of 18.1 mg/kg/dose (SD: 13.3) for dystonia, compared to 7.61 mg/kg/dose (SD: 4.14) for pain relief without dystonia (z = -2.54, p = 0.011) was noted.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION:
Gabapentin may significantly ameliorate dystonia severity and improve activities of daily living and quality of life in children with severe dystonia.