“Foreign Accent Syndrome” (FAS) is a rare disorder in which
patients start to speak with a foreign or regional tone. This striking
condition is often associated with brain damage, such as stroke. Presumably,
the lesion affects the neural pathways by which the brain controls the tongue
and vocal cords, thus producing a strange sounding speech.
Yet there may be more to FAS than meets the eye (or ear).
According to a new paper in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and
Psychiatry, many or even most cases of FAS are ‘functional’, meaning that the
cause of the symptoms lies in psychological processes rather than a brain
lesion.
To reach this conclusion, authors Laura McWhirter and
colleagues recruited 49 self-described FAS suffers from two online communities
to participate in a study. All were English-speaking. The most common reported
foreign accents were Italian (12 cases), Eastern European (11), French (8) and
German (7), but more obscure accents were also reported including Dutch,
Nigerian, and
Croatian. Participants submitted a recording of their voice for assessment by speech experts, as well as answering questions about their symptoms, other health conditions, and personal situation.
Croatian. Participants submitted a recording of their voice for assessment by speech experts, as well as answering questions about their symptoms, other health conditions, and personal situation.
McWhirter et al.
classified 35 of the 49 patients (71%) as having ‘probably functional’ FAS,
while only 10/49 (20%) were said to probably have a neurological basis, with
the rest unclear.
These classifications are somewhat subjective in that there
are no hard-and-fast criteria for functional FAS. None of the ‘functional’
cases reported hard evidence of neurological damage from a brain scan, but only
50% of the ‘neurological’ cases did report such evidence. The presence of other
‘functional’ symptoms such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was higher in the
‘functional’ group.
In terms of the characteristics of the foreign accents,
patients with a presumed functional origin often presented with speech patterns
that showed inconsistency or variability. For instance, pronouncing ‘cookie
jar’ as ‘tutty dar’ but being able to correctly produce ‘j’, /k/, /g/ and ‘sh’
sounds as part of other words.
But if FAS is often a psychological disorder, what is the
psychology behind it? McWhirtner et al. don’t get into this, but it is
interesting to note that FAS is often a media-friendly condition. In recent
years there have been many news stories dedicated to individual FAS cases. To
take just three:
American beauty queen with Foreign Accent Syndrome sounds
IRISH, AUSTRALIAN and BRITISH
Scouse mum regains speech after stroke – but is shocked when
her accent turns Russian
Traumatic car accident victim has Irish accent after suffering
severe brain injury
Perhaps the popularity of FAS has become a self-fulfilling
prophecy? I wouldn’t be surprised if people who have heard of FAS through the
media are more likely to develop the syndrome themselves, in response to a
stressful trigger event.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2019/03/09/curious-foreign-accent-syndrome/#.XM_VAuhKjIU
McWhirter L, Miller N, Campbell C, Hoeritzauer I, Lawton A,
Carson A, Stone J. Understanding foreign accent syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
2019 Mar 2. pii: jnnp-2018-319842. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319842. [Epub
ahead of print]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Foreign accent syndrome (FAS) is widely understood as an
unusual consequence of structural neurological damage, but may sometimes
represent a functional neurological disorder. This observational study aimed to
assess the prevalence and utility of positive features of functional FAS in a
large group of individuals reporting FAS.
METHODS:
Participants self-reporting FAS recruited from informal
unmoderated online support forums and via professional networks completed an
online survey. Speech samples were analysed in a subgroup.
RESULTS:
Forty-nine respondents (24 UK, 23 North America, 2
Australia) reported FAS of mean duration 3 years (range 2 months to 18 years).
Common triggers were: migraine/severe headache (15), stroke (12), surgery or
injury to mouth or face (6) and seizure (5, including 3 non-epileptic). High
levels of comorbidity included migraine (33), irritable bowel syndrome (17),
functional neurological disorder (12) and chronic pain (12). Five reported structural
lesions on imaging. Author consensus on aetiology divided into, 'probably
functional (n=35.71%), 'possibly structural' (n=4.8%) and 'probably structural'
(n=10.20%), but positive features of functional FAS were present in all groups.
Blinded analysis of speech recordings supplied by 13 respondents correctly
categorised 11 (85%) on the basis of probable aetiology (functional vs
structural) in agreement with case history assignment.
CONCLUSIONS:
This largest case series to date details the experience of
individuals with self-reported FAS. Although conclusions are limited by the
recruitment methods, high levels of functional disorder comorbidity, symptom
variability and additional linguistic and behavioural features suggest that
chronic FAS may in some cases represent a functional neurological disorder,
even when a structural lesion is present.
No comments:
Post a Comment