Dalziel SR, Borland ML, Furyk J, Bonisch M, Neutze J, Donath
S, Francis KL, Sharpe C, Harvey AS, Davidson A, Craig S, Phillips N, George
S, Rao A, Cheng N, Zhang M, Kochar A, Brabyn C, Oakley E, Babl FE; PREDICT
research network. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for second-line treatment of
convulsive status epilepticus in children (ConSEPT): an open-label,
multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 17. pii:
S0140-6736(19)30722-6. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30722-6. [Epub ahead of print]
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Phenytoin is the current standard of care for second-line
treatment of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus after failure of
first-line benzodiazepines, but is only effective in 60% of cases and is
associated with considerable adverse effects. A newer anticonvulsant,
levetiracetam, can be given more quickly, is potentially more efficacious, and
has a more tolerable adverse effect profile. We aimed to determine whether
phenytoin or levetiracetam is the superior second-line treatment for paediatric
convulsive status epilepticus.
METHODS:
ConSEPT was an open-label, multicentre, randomised
controlled trial conducted in 13 emergency departments in Australia and New
Zealand. Children aged between 3 months and 16 years, with convulsive status
epilepticus that failed first-line benzodiazepine treatment, were randomly
assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated permuted block (block sizes 2 and 4)
randomisation sequence, stratified by site and age (≤5 years, >5 years), to
receive 20 mg/kg phenytoin (intravenous or intraosseous infusion over 20 min)
or 40 mg/kg levetiracetam (intravenous or intraosseous infusion over 5 min).
The primary outcome was clinical cessation of seizure activity 5 min after the
completion of infusion of the study drug. Analysis was by intention to treat.
This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials
Registry, number ACTRN12615000129583.
FINDINGS:
Between March 19, 2015, and Nov 29, 2017, 639 children
presented to participating emergency departments with convulsive status
epilepticus; 127 were missed, and 278 did not meet eligibility criteria. The
parents of one child declined to give consent, leaving 233 children (114
assigned to phenytoin and 119 assigned to levetiracetam) in the
intention-to-treat population. Clinical cessation of seizure activity 5 min
after completion of infusion of study drug occurred in 68 (60%) patients in the
phenytoin group and 60 (50%) patients in the levetiracetam group (risk
difference -9·2% [95% CI -21·9 to 3·5]; p=0·16). One participant in the
phenytoin group died at 27 days because of haemorrhagic encephalitis; this
death was not thought to be due to the study drug. There were no other serious
adverse events.
INTERPRETATION:
Levetiracetam is not superior to phenytoin for second-line
management of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus.
No comments:
Post a Comment