David E. Mandelbaum, Suzanne M. de la Monte. Adverse
Structural and Functional Effects of Marijuana on the Brain: Evidence Reviewed. Pediatric Neurology. Article in Press.
Abstract
The growing use and legalization of cannabis are leading to
increased exposures across all age groups, including in adolescence. The
touting of its medicinal values stems from anecdotal reports related to
treatment of a broad range of illnesses including epilepsy, multiple sclerosis,
muscle spasms, arthritis, obesity, cancer, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson
disease, post-traumatic stress, inflammatory bowel disease, and anxiety.
However, it is essential that anecdotal data and the high level of interest in
this treatment not obscure objective assessments of any potential and realized
short- and long-term adverse effects of cannabis, particularly with respect to
age of onset and chronicity of exposure. This critical review focuses on
evidence-based research designed to assess both therapeutic benefits and
harmful effects of cannabis exposure and is combined with an illustration of
the neuropathologic findings in a fatal case of cannabis-induced psychosis. The
literature and reported case provide strong evidence that chronic cannabis
abuse causes cognitive impairment and damages the brain, particularly white
matter, where cannabinoid 1 receptors abound. Contrary to popular perception,
there are few objective data supporting preferential use of cannabis over
conventional therapy for restoration of central nervous system structure and
function in disease states such as multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, or
schizophrenia. Additional research is needed to determine if subsets of
individuals with various neurological and psychiatric diseases derive
therapeutic benefits from cannabis.
________________________________________________________________________
From the article
Neuropsychiatric effects of cannabis vary in severity and
can be associated with neuropsychologic deficits, reduced motivation and
activity, hallucinations, or symptoms of schizophrenia-like psychotic disorders. Heavy regular cannabis use, especially in
adolescents (before age 15 years), is associated with higher rates of
persistent negative outcomes in adulthood, including increased rates of mental
illness and cognitive impairment. Because
schizophrenic psychosis and cannabis use share a number of similarities and
both begin in late adolescence, a major concern is whether adolescent cannabis
use causes or triggers chronic psychosis or schizophrenia and whether the
neuroanatomic substrates of cannabis neurodegeneration and schizophrenia are
shared. For example, both heavy cannabis
users and schizophrenics have diminished regional gray and white matter
volumes, and close relatives of schizophrenics have high cannabis use. However, in a well-controlled study, Dekker
et al. demonstrated that schizophrenia was not
triggered more frequently by adolescent compared with later-onset cannabis use,
and that the characteristic white matter abnormalities in the corpora callosa
of schizophrenics were not correlated with age of onset of cannabis use.
Therefore the schizophrenia-like psychotic disorders associated with heavy
cannabis use are likely distinct from schizophrenia.
Another consideration is that cannabis use may precipitate
psychosis in susceptible individuals. A study of 410 patients with
first-episode psychosis found that those with a history of cannabis use
presented with psychosis at a younger age than those who never used cannabis.
In addition, those using high-potency cannabis (skunk-type) every day had the
earliest onset compared with never users.
The findings in a study of more than 1000 patients with psychotic
disorders, their unaffected siblings, parents, and control subjects suggest
that gene–cannabis interactions may influence vulnerability to adverse mental
health effects of cannabis use. However,
the possibility that individuals with emerging mental illness might seek out
psychoactive substances limits the ability to establish a clear cause–effect
relationship between cannabinoid use and psychiatric disease based on
retrospective studies…
Meta-analysis data show that heavy cannabis using adults
exhibit significant deficits in learning, working memory, and attention, but
with abstinence, these problems may resolve.
In contrast, adolescence is a critical period of neurodevelopment during
which synaptic modulation and myelination are highly active and therefore could
be disrupted by exogenous exposures to drugs and toxins. In this regard, concerns have been raised
about chronic heavy cannabis use and cognitive decline in adolescents. To help
address this question, a birth cohort of 1037 individuals was followed from
birth (1972/1973) to age 38 years in Dunedin, New Zealand. Cannabis use was
ascertained at ages 18, 21, 26, 32, and 38 years, and neuropsychologic testing
was performed on all subjects at ages 13 and 38 years. This study found that
persistent cannabis use was associated with broad neuropsychologic declines
across multiple domains of functioning, even after controlling for years of
education. Persistent users reported more cognitive problems. Cognitive
impairment was mainly associated with cannabis use from adolescence, and more
persistent use led to greater declines in cognitive function. The gravity of
these problems is highlighted by the finding that cessation of cannabis use did
not fully restore neuropsychologic function in adolescent-onset cannabis users…
Besides its adverse
effects on cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric functions, cannabinoid use
has been linked to structural changes in the brain. High-resolution MRI with
morphometric analysis of gray matter density, volume, and shape was performed
on 20 individuals, aged 18 to 25 years, who either had self-report histories of
least weekly cannabis use or were abstinent control subjects. None of the cannabis users met DSM-IV
criteria for drug dependence or any current or lifetime Axis I disorder, and
all tested negative for alcohol use disorder. The study found a statistical
trend effect of higher gray matter densities in the left nucleus accumbens
among cannabis users compared with control subjects. In addition, there were
statistically significant shape differences in the left nucleus accumbens and
right amygdala among cannabis users. Gilman et al. concluded that in adolescent
humans, the cannabis exposure-dependent alterations of the neural matrix of
core reward structures are reminiscent of the dendritic arborization changes
observed in experimental animal studies...
In an open label, uncontrolled study of CBD in children with
refractory epilepsy, adverse events were reported in 128 of 162 (79%) of the
enrolled subjects. The most common
adverse effects were somnolence (25%), decreased appetite (19%), diarrhea
(19%), fatigue (13%), and convulsions (11%). Serious adverse events, including
one death, occurred in 30% of patients, and in 12%, the adverse effects were
directly attributed to CBD. The most common serious adverse effect was status
epilepticus (6%). Mechanistically, some adverse effects such as somnolence and
fatigue may have been caused by CBD-induced increases in serum clobazam
levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment